Skip to main content
Tenders

Renovation of didactic rooms with communication routes in the CKZiU building at ul. Armii Krajowej 75 - implementation of SANEPID recommendations

Open
Deadline
13 days left
April 10, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
2026/BZP 00172394/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Lubuskie, Poland
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 26, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 03, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 10, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
Not specified
Location
Lubuskie
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€12,641,706
Avg. Bids
0.1
Competition
Low
SME Winners
86%
133,693 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Renovation of didactic rooms with communication routes in the CKZiU building at ul. Armii Krajowej 75 - implementation of SANEPID recommendations

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

6 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de8b12-6198-e9fe-5fad-950001e70d46.pdf

This document is a public procurement notice for construction works involving the renovation of educational rooms and communication routes in a building, in compliance with SANEPID recommendations.

Zał. nr 1 - Formularz oferty.docxDOC
Zał. nr 1 - Formularz oferty.docx -- 25.7 KB

No content extracted

Zał. nr 2 - Oświadczenie wykonawcy.docxDOC
Zał. nr 2 - Oświadczenie wykonawcy.docx -- 17.6 KB

No content extracted

Zał. nr 3 - Oświadczenie dot. grupy kapitałowej.docxDOC
Zał. nr 3 - Oświadczenie dot. grupy kapitałow... -- 15.3 KB

No content extracted

Zał. nr 4- wzór umowy.docxDOC
Zał. nr 4- wzór umowy.docx -- 50.6 KB

No content extracted

Zał. nr 5- Opis przedmiotu zamówienia (przedmiar robót) (2).pdfPDF
Zał. nr 5- Opis przedmiotu zamówienia (przedm... -- 165.0 KB

No content extracted

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for construction works is generally well-structured with clear documentation and e-procurement characteristics. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on contract duration and financing, impacting practicality and completeness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general procurement regulations with a clear CPV code and active status. The procedure is not specified, which is a minor omission. The deadline is noted as potentially short, but without further context on the complexity of the works, it's difficult to definitively flag as non-compliant. No disputes are reported.

Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, referencing SANEPID recommendations. The AI-extracted requirements list key areas. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria is a significant clarity issue for bidders.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, and deadline. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and crucial details like contract duration and financing information are missing. The number of attached documents is specified, but their content is not fully accessible or summarized for all.

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing contract duration
Fairness85/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which promotes fairness. The value is not disclosed, which can be a concern for transparency, but it's not classified, suggesting it might be below certain thresholds. There are no immediately apparent requirements tailored to specific companies. The deadline is noted as potentially short, which could impact fairness if it hinders adequate preparation.

Deadline may be too short
Practicality65/100

The tender is characterized as e-procurement, which is positive. However, the lack of disclosed contract duration and financing information, along with the absence of a clear contract start date, reduces practicality for potential bidders in their planning and submission.

Missing contract start date
Missing contract duration
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. The dates are logical, and there are no reported suspensions or disputes. The CPV code is appropriate for the described works.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the tender information. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear description of works
E-procurement utilized
Adequate number of tender documents provided
Appropriate CPV code

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
Undisclosed estimated value
Missing contract duration and financing details
Potentially short submission deadline

Recommendations

1. Specify evaluation criteria to enhance clarity and fairness.
2. Disclose the estimated value and provide details on contract duration and financing to improve completeness and practicality.
3. Review the submission deadline to ensure sufficient time for bidder preparation.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline