Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Renovation and repair works in buildings

Open
Deadline
10 days left
April 15, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
2026/BZP 00165481/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Małopolskie, Poland
Published
March 29, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 20, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 08, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 15, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
Not specified
Location
Małopolskie
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€12,641,706
Avg. Bids
0.1
Competition
Low
SME Winners
86%
133,693 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Renovation and repair works in buildings

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for building renovation and repair works presents a moderate competition opportunity. The lack of specified evaluation criteria and detailed requirements necessitates a proactive approach to demonstrating value and capability. A winning strategy will focus on robust technical proposals, competitive pricing, and proactive engagement with the contracting authority to define success.

Key Winning Messages

Reliable and High-Quality Renovation and Repair Services

Cost-Effective Solutions for Building Maintenance

Proactive Partnership for Project Success

Key Opportunities
Opportunity to define project success and evaluation criteria through proactive engagement.
Leverage experience in similar renovation and repair projects to showcase capability.
Potential for a less competitive field due to the lack of detailed tender information, rewarding well-prepared bidders.
Key Challenges
Ambiguity in evaluation criteria and specific requirements can lead to misaligned proposals.

Proactively engage with the Contracting Authority (Kraków Nowa Huta Przyszłości S.A.) through clarification requests to understand their priorities and desired outcomes. Develop a flexible proposal that can be adapted based on any feedback received.

Unspecified duration and potential for scope creep without clear parameters.

Develop a robust project management framework that includes clear phases, milestones, and change control processes. Include assumptions about typical project durations for similar works in the proposal, while highlighting the need for detailed scope definition.

Lack of explicit emphasis on Green or Social Procurement may lead bidders to overlook these aspects, creating an opportunity for differentiation.

While not mandatory, voluntarily incorporating sustainable practices or local employment initiatives can serve as a differentiator and demonstrate forward-thinking.

Ideal Bidder Profile
An experienced construction company with a proven track record in building renovation and repair, possessing strong project management capabilities, a skilled workforce, and a clear understanding of Polish construction regulations. The ideal bidder should also be financially stable and capable of delivering high-quality work within potentially undefined timelines.
Key Requirements
Demonstration of technical capability for renovation and repair works
Compliance with mandatory exclusion grounds
Understanding and adherence to Polish construction standards and regulations
Competitive and transparent pricing structure
Clear project execution plan and timeline (even if not specified in tender)
Key Discriminators
A detailed and well-articulated project execution plan that anticipates potential challenges and proposes solutions, even without explicit tender requirements.
A strong emphasis on quality assurance and defect management processes.
A clear and competitive pricing strategy that demonstrates value for money.
Evidence of successful completion of similar building renovation and repair projects, supported by case studies or testimonials.
Social Value Opportunities
Commitment to employing local labor where feasible and to providing training opportunities for unskilled workers from the Kraków region.
Bid Focus Areas
Technical Capability

Provide comprehensive evidence of past successful renovation and repair projects, including details on project scope, complexity, and outcomes. Highlight the expertise of the project team and the availability of skilled personnel. Detail quality control measures and safety protocols.

Pricing

Develop a detailed cost breakdown that is competitive yet reflects the quality and scope of work. Consider offering tiered pricing options or value-added services. Ensure transparency in cost estimation.

Project Management

Present a clear and logical project execution plan, including proposed timelines, resource allocation, risk management strategies, and communication protocols. Demonstrate a proactive approach to managing potential issues.

Recommendations6
Proactive Clarification Requests
CriticalMed effort

Submit formal clarification requests to the Contracting Authority (Kraków Nowa Huta Przyszłości S.A.) to ascertain their expectations regarding evaluation criteria, project scope, and any implicit requirements for renovation and repair works. This will help align the bid with their needs.

Ensures bid relevance and addresses potential ambiguities, increasing win probability.
Develop a Comprehensive Technical Proposal
CriticalHigh effort

Given the lack of specified technical requirements, build a robust technical proposal that showcases extensive experience in building renovation and repair. Include detailed methodologies, quality assurance plans, and safety protocols. Reference past successful projects with similar scope.

Demonstrates capability and builds confidence in the bidder's ability to deliver high-quality work.
Propose a Flexible Project Execution Plan
HighMed effort

Since the duration is not specified, propose a phased approach with clear milestones and a framework for scope adjustments. This demonstrates adaptability and proactive project management, even in the face of uncertainty.

Addresses potential scope creep and timeline ambiguity, positioning the bidder as a reliable partner.
Competitive and Transparent Pricing Strategy
HighMed effort

Develop a detailed cost breakdown that is competitive for the Polish market. Consider offering value-added services or options to enhance the perceived value of the bid.

Directly influences the evaluation and is a key factor in winning bids.
Incorporate Voluntary Social Value Commitments
MediumLow effort

Although not mandatory, include a commitment to local employment and training. This can serve as a differentiator and align with broader public sector objectives.

Enhances the bid's appeal and demonstrates corporate responsibility.
Thorough Due Diligence on Exclusion Grounds
MediumLow effort

Even though specific grounds are not listed, conduct thorough internal checks to ensure full compliance with general Polish procurement law regarding exclusion criteria. This prevents last-minute disqualification.

Minimizes the risk of disqualification.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as a solution-oriented partnership rather than just a service provider. Emphasize proactive problem-solving and a commitment to exceeding expectations, even in the absence of explicit detailed requirements. Highlight a strong understanding of the local context (Kraków Nowa Huta Przyszłości S.A. and the PL213 region).

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No information on specific submission requirements.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No information on specific exclusion grounds.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information on specific eligibility requirements.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information on specific technical capability requirements.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No information on specific financial requirements.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

2 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de868a-b51d-68ae-056e-e50001aa9065.pdf

This document is a public procurement notice from Kraków Nowa Huta Przyszłości S.A. for renovation and repair works in buildings, with the deadline for submission of offers to be communicated electronically.

SWZ.pdfPDF
SWZ.pdf -- 696.0 KB

No content extracted

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for renovation and repair works in buildings is generally well-structured, with most essential information provided. However, the absence of disclosed estimated value and specific evaluation criteria slightly impacts its completeness and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by providing a CPV code and indicating an active status. The procedure type is not specified, which is a minor omission. The submission deadline is provided, but its reasonableness for the scope of work is not assessed here. No disputes are indicated.

Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, and the purpose of the renovation is stated. However, the AI-extracted requirements indicate a lack of specific details regarding exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements, which are crucial for bidders to understand the precise expectations.

Missing specific exclusion grounds
Missing specific eligibility requirements
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the title, organization, and CPV code. The submission deadline is specified. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the contract duration is missing, which are significant omissions for a complete understanding of the tender.

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing contract duration
Fairness85/100

The tender is characterized as E-Procurement, which promotes fairness. The availability of 18 documents, including the SWZ (Specification of the Contract Award), suggests good access to information. However, the lack of disclosed estimated value and the absence of specified evaluation criteria prevent a full assessment of objective criteria, potentially impacting fairness.

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality65/100

The tender is marked as E-Procurement, indicating electronic submission is likely. A submission deadline is provided. However, the contract start date and financing information are not explicitly stated, and the contract duration is missing, which are important practical aspects for bidders.

Missing contract start date
Missing financing information
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, CPV, and submission deadline are populated. The status is active, and no disputes are indicated. The dates provided are logical within the context of a tender. The lack of a reveal date is a minor inconsistency.

Missing reveal date
Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender information. The tender is EU funded, which is a positive indicator of adherence to certain standards, but specific sustainability criteria are absent.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Organization and location specified
CPV code provided
Extensive set of tender documents available
E-Procurement characteristic

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing specific eligibility and technical requirements
Missing evaluation criteria
Absence of sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
2. Provide detailed eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements.
3. Specify the evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and fairness.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline