Skip to main content
Tenders

Construction of a civil defense and civil protection warehouse at ul. Sejneńska 84 (design and build formula)

Open
Deadline
11 days left
April 08, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
2026/BZP 00164101/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Podlaskie, Poland
Published
March 20, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 20, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 01, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 08, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
8 months
Location
Podlaskie
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€12,641,706
Avg. Bids
0.1
Competition
Low
SME Winners
86%
133,693 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Construction of a civil defense and civil protection warehouse at ul. Sejneńska 84 (design and build formula)

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No information
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No information

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de8661-5212-f896-056e-e50001aa8961.pdf

This document is a tender notice for the design and construction of a civil defense warehouse in Suwałki, Poland, with submissions required electronically.

załącznik nr 10 - Projektowane postanowienia umowy.pdfPDF
załącznik nr 10 - Projektowane postanowienia ...

This document contains the draft contract for the construction of a civil defense warehouse, outlining the scope of work, project timeline, and payment terms.

Załącznik nr 9- Wzór zobowiązania.docDOC
Załącznik nr 9- Wzór zobowiązania.doc

This document is a template for a bidder's commitment to provide necessary resources for the construction of a civil defense warehouse.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for a civil defense warehouse in Suwałki is generally well-structured, with a clear description and a good set of available documents. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on financing, impacting its overall completeness and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements, including a proper CPV code and a clear procedure type. The submission deadline is provided, and the organization is clearly identified. There is no indication of disputes. The primary concern is the lack of a specified reveal date for submissions, which is a minor procedural gap.

Missing reveal date
Clarity80/100

The tender title and description are clear, outlining the project as a 'design and build' for a civil defense warehouse. The purpose and some intended equipment are mentioned. However, the absence of explicitly documented technical, financial, and eligibility requirements within the main tender notice means bidders must rely heavily on the attached documents for full understanding.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the title, organization, CPV code, and contract duration. The estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission. While 14 documents are available, the lack of explicit mention of evaluation criteria and detailed requirements in the main notice reduces overall completeness.

Estimated value not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, which promotes transparency. The full set of documents is available, and the contract draft is provided. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies. The lack of disclosed estimated value and explicit evaluation criteria could be perceived as a minor fairness concern, but the overall process appears objective.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies e-procurement and provides a submission deadline and contract duration. However, crucial information such as the contract start date and financing details are missing. The absence of explicit e-submission instructions within the main notice, despite the 'E-Procurement' characteristic, could be a minor hurdle.

Contract start date not specified
Financing information not disclosed
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference number, organization, and deadline are populated. The CPV code is present, and the contract duration is specified. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided are logical within the context of a tender.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU-funded. This suggests a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.

No green procurement mentioned
No social criteria mentioned

Strengths

Clear project description and title
Comprehensive set of attached documents
E-procurement utilized
Proper CPV code provided

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Lack of sustainability considerations
Missing contract start date and financing details

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
2. Clearly outline the evaluation criteria for bids.
3. Incorporate sustainability aspects into the tender requirements.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline