Skip to main content
Tenders

Development and author's supervision of the construction project “Restoration of Varakļāni Manor Palace in Varakļāni, Madona Municipality”

Open
Deadline
23 days left
April 20, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
167957
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Vidzeme, Latvia
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 19, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 13, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 20, 2026

Tender Opening

April 20, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
26 months
Location
Vidzeme
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€83,543
Avg. Bids
3.3
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
100%
7,536 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Development and author's supervision of the construction project “Restoration of Varakļāni Manor Palace in Varakļāni, Madona Municipality”
EU Funded

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

9 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (2)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Bids must be submitted according to the regulations and appendices provided in the "Nolikums ar pielikumiem" document.
--Bids must adhere to the requirements outlined in the "Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija" document.
--The deadline for submission is 2026-04-20T06:00:00.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must be capable of developing a restoration project and providing author's supervision.
--Bidders must be capable of providing these services for the Varakļāni Manor Palace restoration project in Madona municipality.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The tender requires the development of a construction project.
--The tender requires author supervision.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements are detailed in the provided text.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
167957_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260319050909.pdf -- 97.8 KB

This document outlines the tender requirements for the development and author supervision of the Varakļāni Manor Palace restoration project in Madona municipality.

Nolikums ar pielikumiemDOC
MNP2026_5_nolikums ar pielikumiem_9.03.2026.e... -- 210.4 KB

This document contains the regulations and appendices for an open tender procedure for the development of a construction project and author supervision for the Varakļāni manor house restoration in Madona municipality.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for an open tender for the development and author's supervision of the restoration project of the Varakļāni manor house.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the restoration project of Varakļāni Manor Palace is generally well-structured, with clear technical requirements and a reasonable timeline. However, the lack of disclosed financial value and specific evaluation criteria slightly impacts its completeness and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to open procedure and provides a CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable for the scope. No disputes are noted. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the provided information.

Clarity80/100

The description of the service (development and author supervision of the restoration project) is clear. Technical specifications are referenced in a dedicated document. The location of service execution is detailed.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, and duration. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission for completeness.

Estimated value not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, promoting broad participation. E-procurement is utilized. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria means bidders cannot fully understand how their submissions will be assessed, potentially impacting fairness.

No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

E-submission is indicated. Contract duration is specified. Financing information is not detailed. The contract start date is not explicitly stated, but implied by the reveal date and submission deadline.

Financing information not detailed
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical and do not indicate suspension. No disputes are reported.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is marked as EU Funded, which often implies adherence to certain sustainability standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided text.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Clear technical requirements referenced
Open procedure for broad participation
E-procurement utilized
Reasonable timeline provided

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
No evaluation criteria specified
Lack of explicit sustainability criteria

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated financial value of the tender.
2. Clearly outline the evaluation criteria for bid assessment.
3. Incorporate specific sustainability or innovation requirements if applicable.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline