Fundraising Consultant

This tender is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a disclosed value. However, it lacks detailed requirements and evaluation criteria, impacting completeness and clarity.

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements with a clear procedure (open competition below threshold) and a proper CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable for the scope, and no disputes are noted. The procedure is compliant with below-threshold regulations.

The description of the service is concise and understandable. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria and detailed requirements for eligibility, technical capability, and financial standing significantly reduces clarity for potential bidders.

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, description, estimated value, and contract duration. However, the lack of detailed requirements and attached documents with content is a significant omission.

The tender is an open competition, which promotes fairness. The value is disclosed, and the procedure is standard. The lack of specific tailored requirements for companies is positive. However, the absence of clear evaluation criteria could lead to subjective assessments.

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the lack of information regarding e-submission and the absence of explicit financing details (beyond the estimated value) reduce its practicality for bidders.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The timeline appears consistent.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which limits its sustainability score.