Skip to main content
Tenders

The Streetly Academy - Cleaning Tender

Open
Deadline
126 days left
July 31, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
011804-2026
Value
£962,546
Location
West Midlands, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 10, 2026

Deadline for Questions

July 24, 2026

Submission Deadline

July 31, 2026

Contract Start Date

July 31, 2026

Budget
£962,546
Duration
36 months
Location
West Midlands
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Tender for cleaning services at The Streetly Academy for 1500 students and 180 staff, for a 3-year contract with an option for a further two years. The school seeks best value and innovative ideas for cleaning services.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

23 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (6)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (10)
Financial (5)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--Participate in a two-stage Competitive Flexible Procedure.
--Submit a response for Stage 1, the Procurement Specific Questionnaire (PSQ).
--If selected, submit a response for Stage 2, the Invitation To Tender (ITT).
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--None explicitly stated in the provided tender information.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Achieve a minimum score of 60% in Stage 1 (Procurement Specific Questionnaire) to progress to Stage 2.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS10
--Provide excellent cleaning services for a facility with 1500 students and 180 staff.
--Be able to review and propose enhancements to current cleaning services, including core term time and periodic deep cleaning.
--Deliver a tightly managed service with high levels of productivity.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS5
--Possess a minimum of £5 million for Employers' Liability insurance.
--Possess a minimum of £5 million for Public Liability insurance.
--Have achieved a minimum annual turnover of £900,000.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

OCDS RecordDOC
011804-2026_ocds_record.json

The Streetly Academy seeks a high-quality cleaning service provider for a 3-5 year contract, valued at £802,121.75 + VAT, requiring £5M insurance, £900k annual turnover, and a two-stage competitive flexible procedure with 65% quality evaluation.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
011804-2026_ocds_release.json

The Streetly Academy seeks a high-quality cleaning service for its 1500 students and 180 staff, requiring a minimum £900,000 annual turnover, £5 million insurance, and a two-stage competitive process valuing quality over price for a 3-5 year contract.

Official PDF VersionPDF
011804-2026_official.pdf

The Streetly Academy is seeking a high-quality cleaning service provider for a 3-year contract (with a 2-year extension option) for its 1500 students and 180 staff, requiring a minimum £900k annual turnover, £5M insurance, and a two-stage competitive process valuing quality over price.

Tender NoticeHTM
011804-2026.html

The Streetly Academy seeks a high-quality, innovative cleaning service provider for a 3-year contract (with a 2-year extension option) for its 1500-student facility, requiring £5M liability insurance and £900k minimum annual turnover, evaluated through a two-stage process (65% quality, 35% price).

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for cleaning services at The Streetly Academy is generally well-structured and clear, emphasizing quality and innovation, but is marred by an unusual tender fee and some data inconsistencies.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance80/100

The tender outlines a clear Competitive Flexible Procedure, appropriate CPV codes, and a reasonable submission deadline. It appears compliant with national regulations, although the absence of a reveal date and the RIVA tender fee are minor deviations from best practice. Evaluation criteria for Stage 2 are specified.

Missing reveal date
RIVA tender fee
Clarity90/100

The tender description is highly detailed, clearly articulating the school's expectations for service quality, staff management, and innovation. Requirements, including financial and technical capabilities, are well-documented and easy to understand. Evaluation criteria for the second stage are explicitly stated.

Completeness75/100

Most essential information, such as title, reference, organization, value, and duration, is provided. All four associated documents are available. However, the contract start date in the structured data is inconsistent with the description, and some fields like 'Liable Person' are empty.

Inconsistent contract start date (structured data vs. description)
Empty 'Liable Person' field
Fairness65/100

The tender offers full document access, discloses the estimated value, and provides ample time for preparation. Evaluation criteria for Stage 2 are transparent. However, the requirement for the successful tenderer to pay a 'RIVA tender fee' is highly unusual for public procurement and could be perceived as a barrier to entry, impacting fairness.

Requirement to pay a 'RIVA tender fee'
Practicality85/100

Electronic submission is supported via the Delta eSourcing portal, and direct links are provided. The contract duration and financing information are clearly specified. The contract start date is known from the description, despite a minor inconsistency in the structured data.

Minor inconsistency in contract start date in structured data
Data Consistency60/100

While most key fields are populated and there are no disputes, there is a significant inconsistency regarding the contract start date between the structured data (submission deadline) and the descriptive text (01/08/2026). Minor fields like 'Liable Person' and procedure codes are also unpopulated.

Inconsistent contract start date
Unpopulated 'Liable Person' and procedure code fields
Sustainability50/100

The tender explicitly welcomes innovative and creative ideas for service improvement, which is a positive aspect. It also implies social considerations through the management of incumbent staff (TUPE) and expectations for staff development. However, there are no explicit green procurement criteria or broader social clauses.

Lack of explicit green procurement criteria
Limited broader social clauses

Strengths

Clear and detailed description of requirements and expectations
Emphasis on quality (65%) and innovation in evaluation
Ample time provided for tender preparation and submission
Electronic submission via a dedicated portal
Transparent disclosure of contract value and duration

Concerns

Requirement for the successful tenderer to pay a 'RIVA tender fee'
Inconsistency in the contract start date between structured data and description
Lack of explicit green procurement criteria
Missing reveal date for the tender
Unpopulated 'Liable Person' and procedure code fields

Recommendations

1. Clarify and justify the 'RIVA tender fee' or remove it to ensure equitable access for all bidders.
2. Correct the inconsistent contract start date in the structured data to align with the descriptive text.
3. Consider incorporating explicit environmental sustainability criteria into the tender requirements.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline