Skip to main content
Tenders

Stockton on the Forest Primary School Kitchen refurbishment and intervention room creation 2026

Open
Deadline
31 days left
April 28, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
025935-2026
Value
£319,440
Location
North Yorkshire, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 20, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 21, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 28, 2026

Contract Start Date

July 19, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£319,440
Duration
4 months
Location
North Yorkshire
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

The City of York Council has an opportunity for Stockton on the Forest Primary School Kitchen refurbishment and intervention room creation 2026

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--*
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--*
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--*
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--*
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--*

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for school kitchen refurbishment offers a clear description and adequate financial information. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on submission requirements, impacting overall completeness and clarity.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with basic legal requirements, including a clear procedure (open competition below threshold) and a proper CPV code. No disputes are reported. The deadline, while potentially tight, is specified. The absence of a reveal date is a minor procedural oversight.

Missing reveal date
Clarity80/100

The description of the project is clear, and the estimated value is disclosed. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria and detailed submission requirements leaves room for ambiguity regarding how bids will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, organization, reference, deadline, value, and duration. However, the AI-extracted requirements section is empty, and the tender documents are listed without content summaries, hindering a full assessment of completeness.

AI-extracted requirements section empty
Tender documents lack content summaries
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open competition, suggesting a fair process. The value is disclosed, and the deadline, while potentially short, is provided. There are no immediately apparent requirements tailored to specific companies. The lack of specified evaluation criteria could be a minor concern for fairness if not addressed in the full documents.

Practicality65/100

The contract start date and duration are specified. However, the absence of information regarding e-submission and the URL for documents limits practicality. Financing information is not explicitly detailed.

No e-submission mentioned
Document URL not provided
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, organization, reference, deadline, value, and duration are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. The dates provided are logical within the context of the tender timeline.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a limited focus on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear project description
Specified estimated value and duration
Open competition procedure
Basic legal compliance

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
Lack of detail in AI-extracted requirements
Tender documents without content summaries
No explicit mention of e-submission

Recommendations

1. Provide specific evaluation criteria within the tender documents.
2. Ensure all tender documents have accessible content summaries or direct links.
3. Clarify the e-submission process and provide necessary links.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline