Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

19 Hollands Road - Refurbishment

Open
Deadline
13 days left
April 10, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
019415-2026
Value
£156,000
Location
East Anglia, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 04, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 03, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 10, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 31, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£156,000
Duration
4 months
Location
East Anglia
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Partial demolition of existing internal rooms and construction of new internal spaces to form new accommodation and associated elements, alterations to doors, windows, minor roof repairs and external works.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements provided]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Partial demolition of existing internal rooms and construction of new internal spaces to form new accommodation and associated elements, alterations to doors, windows, minor roof repairs and external works.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender presents a moderately well-structured opportunity for construction refurbishment. While core information is available, critical details regarding evaluation criteria and submission methods are absent, impacting overall clarity and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general regulatory frameworks by providing a CPV code and indicating an open competition procedure below the financial threshold. The deadline is reasonable given the contract value and duration. No disputes are flagged.

Clarity80/100

The description of works is sufficiently detailed for the scope. However, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria is a significant clarity issue, leaving potential bidders uncertain about how their submissions will be assessed.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Essential information like title, organization, value, and deadlines are present. However, the lack of any accessible document content or summaries prevents a thorough review of all requirements, thus impacting completeness.

No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is open and discloses the estimated value, promoting fairness. There are no explicitly tailored requirements favouring specific companies. The criteria, once specified, will be key to assessing overall fairness.

Practicality65/100

The absence of information regarding e-submission methods and the requirement for manual document access through potentially unlinked URLs reduces practicality. The contract start date is clearly specified.

No e-submission
Document URL not specified/accessible
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are consistently populated and logically aligned. No suspension or disputes are reported.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation requirements, nor is it indicated as EU funded, resulting in a moderate score for this category.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear description of works
Disclosed estimated value and deadlines
Open competition procedure
No apparent company-specific tailoring

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
Lack of accessible tender document content
Absence of e-submission details
No sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Specify clear and objective evaluation criteria.
2. Ensure all tender documents are readily accessible with clear links or instructions for retrieval.
3. Clarify the e-submission process.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline