CP2779-26 Major Refurbishments - Hele Bridge (00024)

This tender for major refurbishments of Hele Bridge is generally well-structured with clear technical requirements, but lacks explicit evaluation criteria and details on e-submission, impacting its overall practicality and fairness.

The tender appears to comply with basic legal requirements for an open competition below the threshold. The CPV code is specified, and the procedure is identified. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered tight given the complexity. No disputes are indicated. The primary concern is the absence of explicitly stated evaluation criteria, which is a fundamental aspect of a transparent legal process.

The description of the works is detailed and specific, outlining the scope of repairs, materials, and site conditions. Technical requirements are clearly articulated, including experience with listed buildings and specific repair techniques. The responsibilities of the contractor and client are well-defined.

Most essential information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, contract duration, and start date. The description is comprehensive. However, the lack of available tender document content and the absence of explicit evaluation criteria reduce the completeness score.

The tender is an open competition, which promotes fairness. The estimated value is disclosed, and the requirements, while specific to the technical nature of the bridge, do not appear to be tailored to a single company. The main drawback is the lack of transparency regarding how bids will be evaluated.

The tender specifies a contract duration and start date, and the estimated value is clear. However, the absence of information regarding e-submission and the lack of accessible tender documents (URLs) significantly hinder practical application for potential bidders.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided for the contract duration and start align with the project's described timeline.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation requirements. It is not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.