Skip to main content
Tenders

Professional Support - Cladding

Open
Deadline
12 days left
April 09, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
027388-2026
Value
£200,000
Location
Yorkshire and the Humber, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 25, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 02, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 09, 2026

Contract Start Date

October 01, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£200,000
Duration
2 months
Location
Yorkshire and the Humber
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

We are seeking expressions of interest from suitably experienced suppliers to provide pretender professional support in relation to proposed cladding replacement works at two residential buildings in Leeds.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

6 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (2)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific requirements listed.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Suitably experienced suppliers.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Provide pretender professional support.
--Services related to proposed cladding replacement works.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender is in the planning stage and seeks expressions of interest for professional support in cladding replacement. While generally well-structured, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on submission requirements, impacting its completeness and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement principles, with a clear CPV code and no immediate red flags regarding disputes or regulatory non-compliance. The deadline, while potentially short, is specified. The procedure type is not specified, which is a minor omission.

Procedure type not specified
Clarity80/100

The description of the required services is clear, outlining the need for pretender professional support for cladding replacement. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult for potential bidders to understand how their submissions will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadline are present. However, the lack of detailed submission requirements and the absence of document content limit the overall completeness of the tender documentation at this planning stage.

No document content available
No specific submission requirements listed
Fairness85/100

The tender is fair in that it does not appear to tailor requirements to specific companies and discloses the estimated value. The use of a standard CPV code and the open call for expressions of interest promote fairness. The lack of specified evaluation criteria could be improved.

Practicality65/100

The tender is in the planning stage, which explains some practical limitations. The absence of e-submission details and the lack of specific submission requirements reduce practicality for potential bidders. The contract duration is short, and the start date is well into the future.

No e-submission details
No specific submission requirements listed
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, indicating good data consistency.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Organization and estimated value disclosed
CPV code provided
Description of services is clear

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
No specific submission requirements listed
No document content available
Lack of sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Specify clear evaluation criteria for submissions.
2. Provide detailed submission requirements and attach relevant documents.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability and innovation aspects into the tender.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline