Skip to main content
Tenders

Asbestos Surveying, Sampling & Analytical Services

Open
Deadline
21 days left
April 17, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
024723-2026
Value
Not disclosed
Location
West Central Scotland, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 18, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 10, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 17, 2026

Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
Not specified
Location
West Central Scotland
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

RCH are seeking to appoint a highly competent and experienced contractor to undertake Ad-Hoc Asbestos Surveying Sampling & Analytical Services/Remedial works within our properties.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

6 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (2)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements provided]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Must be a highly competent and experienced contractor.
--Must be able to undertake Ad-Hoc Asbestos Surveying Sampling & Analytical Services/Remedial works.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for Asbestos Surveying, Sampling & Analytical Services is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a defined CPV code. However, it lacks crucial details regarding evaluation criteria and financial specifics, impacting completeness and potentially fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements by having a clear procedure, a specified CPV code, and no reported disputes. The deadline, while potentially short, is provided. The absence of a reveal date is a minor procedural oversight.

Missing reveal date
Clarity80/100

The description of services is clear, and the core requirements for competence and experience are stated. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria leaves ambiguity on how proposals will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Essential information like the title, reference, organization, and deadline is present. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and there is no information on contract duration or specific submission requirements, reducing overall completeness.

Estimated value not disclosed
No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, promoting broad participation. The requirements for competence and experience are objective. The lack of disclosed value and specific evaluation criteria could be perceived as a minor fairness concern, but no company-specific tailoring is evident.

Practicality65/100

The tender is marked as E-Procurement, which is positive. However, the lack of a direct URL for document submission and the absence of financing information or contract start date reduce its practical usability for potential bidders.

No e-submission (implied by lack of URL)
Missing financing info
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, and the dates provided are logical. The CPV code is appropriate for the service.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the tender documents. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Specified organization and CPV code
Open procedure type
E-Procurement characteristic

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
No evaluation criteria specified
Lack of document content/summaries
Missing contract duration and start date

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
2. Clearly define the evaluation criteria for submitted bids.
3. Provide direct links or clear instructions for accessing tender documents and e-submission.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline