Skip to main content
Tenders

Request for Information (RFI): Climate Risk Analysis Scenario Modelling & Physical Risk Assessment

Open
Deadline
9 days left
April 06, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
023695-2026
Value
Not disclosed
Location
United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 16, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 30, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 06, 2026

Contract Start Date

April 30, 2026

Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
1 months
Location
United Kingdom
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

The National Wealth Fund seeks market insight on climate risk analysis, including scenario modelling and asset‑level physical risk assessment, to inform future procurement and enhance portfolio‑level decision making.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This RFI is in the planning stage, seeking market insight for climate risk analysis. It has a clear description and specified requirements, but lacks financial details and explicit evaluation criteria.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender is in a planning stage, which inherently limits some legal compliance aspects. The CPV code is appropriate. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered short given the RFI nature. No disputes are reported.

Clarity80/100

The description of the National Wealth Fund's need for climate risk analysis is clear. The AI-extracted requirements list key areas to be addressed. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria for the RFI response reduces overall clarity.

Missing evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Basic information like title, reference, organization, and description are present. The contract duration and start date are specified. However, the estimated value is not disclosed and classified, and the content of the tender documents is not available, impacting completeness.

Value not disclosed
No document content available
Fairness85/100

The RFI is open to market insight, suggesting a fair approach. All basic information is accessible. The lack of disclosed value and specific evaluation criteria could be perceived as less transparent, but the RFI nature implies a broad information gathering. No specific company tailoring is evident.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the lack of information regarding e-submission and the URL for documents limits practicality. Financing information is not disclosed.

No e-submission
Document URL missing
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and CPV code are populated. The dates provided are logical within the planning phase. There are no reported disputes or suspensions.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender information. This suggests a lack of focus on these areas.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear RFI objective and description
Appropriate CPV code provided
Key requirements outlined
Planning stage clearly indicated

Concerns

Financial value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
No document content available
Lack of e-submission details

Recommendations

1. Specify evaluation criteria for RFI responses.
2. Provide access to the full content of the tender documents.
3. Clarify the e-submission process.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline