Skip to main content
Tenders

RFA Licos Training - UK4

Open
Deadline
2 days left
March 30, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
018959-2026
Value
£133,784
Location
Hampshire and Isle of Wight, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 03, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 23, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 30, 2026

Contract Start Date

April 06, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£133,784
Duration
60 months
Location
Hampshire and Isle of Wight
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Liquid Cargo Operations/Handling Commercially provided training for RFA. 5 years of training courses.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

6 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (2)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed in the provided text]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements listed in the provided text]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed in the provided text]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Provision of commercially provided training for Liquid Cargo Operations/Handling for RFA.
--Training courses to be provided over a 5-year period.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed in the provided text]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for Liquid Cargo Operations/Handling training is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and submission requirements, impacting its overall completeness and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with basic legal requirements, including a specified CPV code and a clear procedure type. There are no immediate red flags regarding disputes or regulatory non-compliance based on the provided information. The deadline, while potentially short, is not explicitly stated as unreasonable without further context.

Clarity80/100

The description of the service is clear, and the core requirements for training provision over five years are documented. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves a significant gap in understanding how bids will be assessed.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the organization, reference, estimated value, and contract duration. However, the lack of content in the tender documents and the absence of specific submission requirements mean that crucial details for bidders are missing.

No document content available
Missing submission requirements
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open competition, suggesting a fair process. The value is disclosed, and the criteria, while not fully specified, are not overtly tailored to specific companies. The lack of explicit e-submission details is a minor concern for accessibility.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration, and financing information is implied by the estimated value. However, the lack of explicit e-submission instructions and the absence of document content reduce its practicality for potential bidders.

No e-submission specified
No document content available
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, and the timeline appears consistent.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which limits its sustainability score.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Organization and description provided
Estimated value and CPV code specified
Open competition procedure

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
No document content available
Lack of specific submission requirements
No explicit e-submission process

Recommendations

1. Provide detailed evaluation criteria.
2. Upload full tender documents with content.
3. Specify e-submission procedures and requirements.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline