Skip to main content
Tenders

Reinforcement of the second-floor ceiling beams of Cēsis New Castle

Open
Deadline
3 days left
March 30, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
166599
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Vidzeme, Latvia
Published
February 26, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 26, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 23, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 30, 2026

Tender Opening

March 30, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
4 months
Location
Vidzeme
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€491,981
Avg. Bids
3.0
Competition
Low
SME Winners
99%
20,606 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Reinforcement of the second-floor ceiling beams of Cēsis New Castle

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

10 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (4)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (2)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--[Details to be extracted from 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija']
--[Details to be extracted from 'nolikums_2026_15.']
--[Details to be extracted from '7.1. pielikums_Finansu_piedavajums.']
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[Details to be extracted from 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija']
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[Details to be extracted from 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija']
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--[Details to be extracted from 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija']
--[Details to be extracted from '1. pielikums_Tehniska_Specifikacija']
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--[Details to be extracted from '7.1. pielikums_Finansu_piedavajums.']
--[Details to be extracted from 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija']

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

8 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
166599_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260226053445.pdf -- 97.2 KB

This document outlines the tender requirements for the reinforcement of the second-floor ceiling beams of Cēsis New Castle, including exclusion conditions, technical and financial proposal requirements, and evaluation criteria.

1. pielikums_Tehniska_SpecifikacijaDOC
1. pielikums_Tehniska_Specifikacija.doc -- 54.0 KB

This document contains the technical specification for the reinforcement of the second-floor ceiling beams of Cēsu New Castle.

7.1. pielikums_Finansu_piedavajums.XLS
7.1. pielikums_Finansu_piedavajums.xlsx -- 78.0 KB

This document contains a financial offer form for the reinforcement of the second-floor ceiling beams of Cēsis New Castle, identified by tender ID CNP/2026/15.

8_pielikums Liguma_projekts CNP_2026_15.DOC
8_pielikums Liguma_projekts CNP_2026_15.docx -- 55.5 KB

This document contains a draft contract for the reinforcement of the second-floor ceiling beams of the Cēsis New Castle, outlining the scope of work, payment terms, and execution deadlines.

nolikums_2026_15.DOC
nolikums_2026_15.docx -- 184.1 KB

This document contains the regulations for an open tender procedure for the reinforcement of the second-floor ceiling beams of Cēsu New Castle, identified as CNP/2026/15.

TS_Pielikums_2_st_parsedze.PDF
TS_Pielikums_2_st_parsedze.pdf -- 4.0 MB

No content extracted

TS_PIELIKUMSPDF
TS_PIELIKUMS.pdf -- 1.6 MB

No content extracted

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the main data for an open tender for the reinforcement of the second-floor ceiling beams of Cēsis New Castle, with a submission deadline of March 30, 2026.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for structural reinforcement work at Cēsis New Castle is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a reasonable timeline. However, the undisclosed estimated value and lack of specified evaluation criteria are notable concerns.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to open procedure and provides a CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable, and the process is described as e-procurement. No disputes are noted. The primary concern is the lack of disclosed evaluation criteria, which can impact legal compliance if not clearly defined elsewhere.

Clarity80/100

The title and description are clear. Key documents like technical specifications and contract drafts are provided. However, the AI-extracted requirements indicate that crucial details are embedded within documents that may not be fully accessible or easily parsed, potentially affecting overall clarity.

Details for mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical capability, financial, and submission requirements are referenced as needing extraction from specific documents, suggesting potential for ambiguity if these documents are not readily available or clear.
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, and deadlines. Contract duration is specified. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission for completeness. The number of attached documents is high, but the content of two is unknown.

Estimated value is not disclosed.
Two documents (TS_Pielikums_2_st_parsedze, TS_PIELIKUMS) have unknown content.
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure with e-procurement, promoting fairness. The contract duration is reasonable. However, the undisclosed estimated value and the flagged 'Restricted document access' are significant concerns regarding transparency and equal access for all potential bidders.

Estimated value is not disclosed.
Restricted document access flagged.
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is positive. A contract start date is not explicitly mentioned, but the contract duration is given. Financing information is not detailed. The primary practicality issue is the potential for restricted document access, which could hinder the submission process.

Contract start date not explicitly stated.
Financing information not detailed.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. The tender is active, with no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates are logically ordered (Reveal Date before Submission Deadline and Opening Date).

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information. The tender is not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

No green procurement criteria mentioned.
No social aspects mentioned.

Strengths

Clear title and description of works.
Open procedure with e-procurement.
Reasonable submission deadline and contract duration.
Key documents (technical spec, contract draft) are provided.

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed.
Lack of specified evaluation criteria.
Potential for restricted document access.
Absence of sustainability considerations (green, social, innovation).

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract to ensure transparency and fairness.
2. Clearly specify the evaluation criteria within the tender documents.
3. Ensure all required documents are fully accessible to all potential bidders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline