Carriageway Resurfacing Works 2026/27 - Bulk Tender 2

This tender for carriageway resurfacing works is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a disclosed value. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and mandatory/eligibility requirements, impacting completeness and clarity.

The tender appears to comply with basic legal requirements, including a clear procedure (open competition below threshold) and a proper CPV code. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered tight given the scope. No disputes are reported. The absence of a reveal date is a minor procedural oversight.

The description of the works is clear and concise. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria and detailed requirements for exclusion, eligibility, technical, and financial capabilities significantly reduces clarity for potential bidders.

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration/start. However, the lack of detailed requirements and the absence of content in the tender documents mean that crucial information for bidders is missing.

The tender is an open competition, which promotes fairness. The value is disclosed, and the procedure is standard. However, the lack of specified objective criteria for evaluation and the absence of detailed requirements could lead to subjective assessments. The lack of e-submission is a drawback.

The tender provides a contract start date and duration. However, the lack of explicit mention of e-submission and the absence of financing information reduce its practicality for modern procurement processes. The short submission deadline also poses a practical challenge.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, and the dates provided are consistent with each other.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of emphasis on these important aspects.