Skip to main content
Tenders

Dust suppression of gravel surface with calcium chloride

Open
Deadline
4 days left
March 31, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
167903
Value
€12,909
Location
Zemgale, Latvia
Published
March 16, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Technical Proposal ComplianceTechnical
Experience in Calcium Chloride ApplicationExperience
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 16, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 24, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 31, 2026

Tender Opening

March 31, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€12,909
Duration
1 months
Location
Zemgale
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€82,313
Avg. Bids
1.7
Competition
Low
SME Winners
99%
4,915 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Dust suppression of gravel surface with calcium chloride

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

9 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (3)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Bids must be submitted by the deadline: 2026-03-31T11:00:00.
--Bidders must adhere to the regulations and attachments provided in the "Nolikums ar pielikumiem" document.
--Bidders must meet the selection criteria outlined in the "Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija" document.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not be subject to exclusion grounds as defined by law.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must possess the necessary legal capacity and authorization to perform the services.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must demonstrate experience in applying calcium chloride to road surfaces.
--Bidders must provide a technical proposal outlining their approach to the application of calcium chloride.
--The technical proposal should align with the provided list of work volumes, including street names, lengths, widths, and areas.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Not specified in the provided documents.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
167903_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260316140135.pdf -- 104.1 KB

This document outlines the requirements for bidders participating in a procurement process for the application of calcium chloride to gravel surfaces, including exclusion conditions, selection criteria, and technical proposal expectations.

Tehniskās specifikācijas pielikums-darba apjomu sarakstsXLS
Darbu_apjomu_saraksts_Vecumns_apv_parv_Atpute... -- 14.6 KB

This document contains a list of work volumes, specifying street names, lengths, widths, and areas for the application of calcium chloride to gravel surfaces.

Nolikums ar pielikumiemDOC
NOLIKUMS_atputeklosana_2026_parakst.doc -- 362.0 KB

This document contains the regulations and attachments for a public procurement tender organized by the Vecumnieki United Administration for the application of calcium chloride to gravel surfaces.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for procurement VAP 2026/6 concerning the application of calcium chloride to road surfaces, including deadlines, contracting authority, and procurement object details.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for road surface treatment with calcium chloride is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a reasonable timeline. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and has restricted document access, impacting fairness and clarity.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by providing a clear procedure, a proper CPV code, and no reported disputes. Deadlines appear reasonable for the scope of work. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the provided information.

Clarity80/100

The description of the service is clear, and the requirements are documented in attached files. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to fully understand how their proposals will be assessed, reducing overall clarity.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including deadlines, estimated value, and contract duration. Key documents like technical specifications and requirements are attached. However, the lack of explicit financial requirements for bidders could be a point of incompleteness.

Financial requirements not specified
Fairness85/100

The tender offers full document access to essential requirements and technical specifications. The value is disclosed, and deadlines are reasonable. The use of e-procurement is a positive aspect. However, the restricted access to some documents is a concern for fairness.

Restricted document access
Practicality65/100

The tender specifies e-procurement, which is a positive. The contract start date is implied by the reveal date and submission deadline. Financing information is not explicitly detailed. The short contract duration of one month is practical for the described service.

Financing information not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. The dates provided are logical and sequential.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded. Therefore, sustainability aspects are not a focus of this procurement.

No green procurement mentioned
No social criteria mentioned

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Well-defined technical specifications
E-procurement utilized
Reasonable deadlines

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
Restricted document access
Lack of explicit financial requirements for bidders

Recommendations

1. Specify clear evaluation criteria for bidders.
2. Ensure full access to all relevant tender documents.
3. Consider adding explicit financial requirements for bidders if applicable.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline