Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Planned Vessel Maintenance - CPV Eagle MSER

Open
Deadline
5 days left
April 09, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
021346-2026
Value
£50,000
Location
United Kingdom
Published
March 27, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 10, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 02, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 09, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 24, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£50,000
Duration
1 months
Location
United Kingdom
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Tender Notice for Planned Maintenance and Safety Equipment Recertification (MSER) for the Border Security Command CPV Eagle. Work required between 25th May and 5th June 2026 on the East and South coast of England. Procurement via Jaggaer. Bidders must register and login to express interest and participate.

Risk Analysis

Risk analysis is not yet available for this country's tenders. Currently supported: Estonia, Poland, Lithuania, and Latvia.

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

11 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (5)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (2)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--Supplier responses can be configured within JAGGAER ONE.
--Navigate to Sourcing > ITT.
--Select from the sub-menu items: ITTs Open to All Suppliers.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders are required to complete the Qualification Envelope.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders need to register and login to express interest and participate in the ITT.
--Bidders are required to complete the Qualification Envelope.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders are required to complete the Technical Envelope.
--The full package of works required is detailed in the Statement of Requirements and Pricing Tool available via the ITT.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders are required to complete the Commercial Envelope.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

Get AI-generated summaries of all tender documents. Quickly understand what each document contains without reading hundreds of pages — covering scope, conditions, evaluation criteria, and key obligations.

Login
75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for planned vessel maintenance is generally well-structured with clear requirements and a defined process, though it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and sustainability considerations.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements for open competition below the threshold. Deadlines are provided, and the procedure is outlined. The CPV code is specified. No disputes are indicated. The use of an e-procurement platform is compliant.

Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, and the need for a Statement of Requirements and Pricing Tool via the ITT is mentioned. The AI-extracted requirements provide a structured overview of what is expected. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria is a notable omission.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration/start. The submission deadline is clear. However, the content of the tender documents is not directly available, requiring registration and login, which impacts overall completeness for initial assessment.

No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is open to all suppliers, and the process is conducted via an e-procurement platform (Jaggaer), promoting accessibility. The value is disclosed, and the criteria for participation (qualification, technical, commercial envelopes) are outlined. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies.

Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes an e-submission platform (Jaggaer) with a provided URL. The contract start date and duration are specified. Financing information is not explicitly detailed, and the short contract duration might pose practical challenges for some bidders.

Financing information not explicitly detailed
Deadline may be too short
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided are logical and sequential.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear description of works and location
Use of e-procurement platform (Jaggaer)
Open competition procedure
All basic information present

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
No document content available without registration
Lack of sustainability considerations
Short contract duration

Recommendations

1. Specify evaluation criteria to enhance transparency.
2. Consider incorporating sustainability aspects (green, social, innovation) into future tenders.
3. Ensure tender documents are accessible for initial review before registration.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline