Skip to main content
Tenders

Repair of asphalt surface potholes on the roads and streets of Kocēni municipality in 2026 and 2027

Open
Deadline
18 days left
April 14, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
168925
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Vidzeme, Latvia
Published
March 25, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 25, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 07, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 14, 2026

Tender Opening

April 14, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
Not specified
Location
Vidzeme
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€491,981
Avg. Bids
3.0
Competition
Low
SME Winners
99%
20,606 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Repair of asphalt surface potholes on the roads and streets of Kocēni municipality in 2026 and 2027

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific submission requirements provided in the document summaries]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific grounds provided in the document summaries]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific eligibility requirements provided in the document summaries]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[Details on technical and financial proposal requirements are outlined in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija']
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[Details on technical and financial proposal requirements are outlined in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija']

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
168925_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260325114934.pdf -- 98.6 KB

This document outlines the requirements for a tender concerning asphalt surface pothole repair on Kocēni municipality roads and streets in 2026 and 2027, detailing exclusion conditions, selection criteria, and technical and financial proposal requirements.

NolikumsDOC
Nolikums KAP 001B.docx -- 111.8 KB

This document contains the regulations for a public procurement tender for asphalt surface pothole repair on roads and streets in the Kocēni municipality for the years 2026 and 2027.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for tender KAP 2026/001B, which is for asphalt surface pothole repair on roads and streets in the Kocēni association for 2026 and 2027.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for pothole repair is generally well-structured with clear basic information and documents. However, it lacks transparency regarding the estimated value and specific evaluation criteria, and document access is restricted.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general procurement procedures, including a clear CPV code and active status. Deadlines appear reasonable for the scope. The primary concern is the lack of disclosed evaluation criteria, which could impact legal compliance if not properly addressed in the full documents.

Missing evaluation criteria specified in the notice
Clarity80/100

The title and description clearly state the subject of the procurement. The existence of detailed requirements in attached documents ('Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija' and 'Nolikums') suggests clarity within those specific documents, though the notice itself could be more explicit about evaluation.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, and deadlines. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the contract duration is not explicitly stated in the main notice, impacting overall completeness.

Estimated value not disclosed
Contract duration not explicitly specified in the notice
Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via open procedure and e-procurement, promoting fairness. However, the 'Restricted document access' flag raises concerns about equal access to all necessary information for potential bidders. The lack of disclosed evaluation criteria also impacts transparency.

Restricted document access
No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is a positive aspect. However, the notice does not explicitly state the contract start date or provide financing information, and the duration is missing, which could hinder practical planning for bidders.

No e-submission mentioned (though e-procurement is listed)
Contract start date not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided (Reveal, Submission, Opening) are logically ordered.

Sustainability50/100

The tender notice does not mention any specific green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. This suggests a lack of explicit sustainability considerations within the procurement process.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and description
Open procedure and e-procurement
Reasonable submission deadline
CPV code provided

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Restricted document access
Missing evaluation criteria
Lack of sustainability focus

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated contract value for greater transparency.
2. Ensure full and unrestricted access to all tender documents for all potential bidders.
3. Specify evaluation criteria clearly in the tender notice or accessible documents.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline