Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Provision of GP Out of Hours and Urgent Treatment Centres on behalf of South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS FT

Open
Deadline
6 days left
April 10, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
024209-2026
Value
£3,900,000
Location
Northumberland and Tyne and Wear, United Kingdom
Published
March 28, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 17, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 03, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 10, 2026

Budget
£3,900,000
Duration
24 months
Location
Northumberland and Tyne and Wear
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Integrated UTC and GP OOH service with sites in Sunderland Royal Hospital and South Tyneside District Hospital

Risk Analysis

Risk analysis is not yet available for this country's tenders. Currently supported: Estonia, Poland, Lithuania, and Latvia.

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI extracts and organizes all requirements from tender documents — mandatory qualifications, technical specifications, financial conditions, and submission rules — clearly categorized so you know exactly what's needed to bid.

Login

Documents

Get AI-generated summaries of all tender documents. Quickly understand what each document contains without reading hundreds of pages — covering scope, conditions, evaluation criteria, and key obligations.

Login
75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for GP Out of Hours and Urgent Treatment Centres is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks detailed evaluation criteria and accessible document content, impacting its overall transparency and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard open procedure requirements and includes a proper CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable for an open procedure, and there are no reported disputes. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the provided information.

Clarity80/100

The description of the service is clear, and the basic requirements (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, submission) are listed. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult to fully assess the clarity of the selection process.

Missing evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. However, the lack of accessible content for the tender documents is a significant omission, hindering a complete understanding of the requirements.

No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, and the estimated value is disclosed. The use of e-procurement is noted. The absence of specific evaluation criteria could be perceived as a minor fairness concern, but there are no overt signs of tailored requirements for specific companies.

Practicality65/100

While e-procurement is mentioned, the 'No e-submission' flag suggests a potential disconnect or an incomplete understanding of the process. The lack of accessible document content also reduces practicality for potential bidders.

No e-submission
No document content available
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, and the dates provided are logical.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a limited focus on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Organization and description provided
Estimated value and contract duration specified
CPV code and NUTS code provided
Open procedure with e-procurement noted

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
No document content available
Potential issues with e-submission process
Limited focus on sustainability

Recommendations

1. Provide detailed evaluation criteria to enhance transparency.
2. Ensure all tender documents are accessible with content summaries.
3. Clarify the e-submission process and confirm its availability.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline