Skip to main content
Tenders

Housing Benefits and Housing Pooling Audit for South Tyneside Council

Open
Deadline
5 days left
April 02, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
022687-2026
Value
£57,600
Location
North East England, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 13, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 26, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 02, 2026

Contract Start Date

April 30, 2026

Budget
£57,600
Duration
7 months
Location
North East England
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

South Tyneside Council require the services of a company to audit Housing Benefits and Housing Pooling Claims for a number of financial years. All 6 audits need to be complete by November 2026

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

7 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (2)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (2)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--The deadline for submission is 2026-04-02T00:00:00.
--The duration of the service is 7 months.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific eligibility requirements are detailed in the provided text.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The company must be able to audit Housing Benefits and Housing Pooling Claims.
--All 6 audits need to be complete by November 2026.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The value of the tender is 57600 EUR.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for housing benefits and pooling audits is generally well-structured, with clear objectives and financial information. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and submission methods, impacting its overall practicality and completeness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with basic legal requirements, including a clear CPV code and a defined procedure for an open competition below the threshold. No disputes are reported. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered tight given the scope.

Clarity80/100

The description of the required services (auditing Housing Benefits and Housing Pooling Claims) is clear. The AI-extracted requirements also provide a good overview of the core needs. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the organization, title, reference, estimated value, and contract duration. The AI-extracted requirements cover key areas. However, the lack of content in the tender documents and the absence of detailed eligibility and exclusion grounds reduce its completeness.

No document content available
No specific mandatory exclusion grounds detailed
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open competition, which promotes fairness. The estimated value is disclosed, and the criteria, while not fully specified, are expected to be objective for an audit. The lack of specific tailored requirements for particular companies is a positive aspect.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the lack of information regarding e-submission and the URL for documents hinders practical access and submission for potential bidders.

No e-submission specified
Document URL not provided
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. The dates provided are logical, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. The contract duration aligns with the completion requirement.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding, which are common elements in modern tenders. This suggests a lack of focus on these areas.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Organization and description provided
Estimated value and contract duration specified
Open competition procedure

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
No document content available
Lack of e-submission details
No explicit sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Specify detailed evaluation criteria to enhance clarity and fairness.
2. Provide direct links to tender documents and clarify the e-submission process.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline