Reconstruction of Leśna Polana street no. 303066 T in Skarżysko-Kamienna

This tender for road reconstruction is generally well-documented with a good number of supporting files, but lacks explicit evaluation criteria and financial details, impacting its overall completeness and practicality.

The tender adheres to standard procurement practices with a clear CPV code and location information. The procedure is not explicitly defined beyond 'None', which is unusual but not necessarily non-compliant if standard national procedures are implied. No disputes are reported. Deadlines seem standard for this type of tender, but the absence of a reveal date is a minor procedural oversight.

The tender title and description are clear, specifying the project and location. A significant number of technical documents (design, specifications, bills of quantities) are provided, indicating a good level of detail for potential bidders. However, the explicit evaluation criteria are missing, which hinders overall clarity on how bids will be assessed.

Most basic information is present, including the contract duration and deadline. However, the estimated value of the contract is not disclosed, which is a significant omission. A large number of documents are attached, covering various aspects of the project, but the lack of disclosed financial value and missing evaluation criteria reduces completeness.

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which promotes accessibility. All documents appear to be accessible through the provided links or as attachments. There are no overtly tailored requirements to specific companies. The lack of disclosed value is a slight concern for fairness, but the overall structure seems objective.

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', suggesting electronic submission. However, the specific mechanism for e-submission is not detailed. The contract start date is not specified, and while financing is implied by a public contract, no explicit details are provided. The duration of 11 months is reasonable.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and CPV code are populated accurately. Dates are logical, and there are no reported suspensions or disputes. The data appears consistent and reliable.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement criteria, social aspects, or innovation within the tender documentation. It is not indicated if the project is EU funded. This suggests a lack of focus on these areas.