Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Broadlea Primary School Fire Risk Assessment

Open
Deadline
17 days left
April 14, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
025813-2026
Value
£216,000
Location
Hampshire and Isle of Wight, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 20, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 07, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 14, 2026

Contract Start Date

July 26, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£216,000
Duration
2 months
Location
Hampshire and Isle of Wight
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Invitation to Tender - Works for the creation of fire compartments, compliant fire doors, new kitchen fire shutter and removal of water supply to former Berryhill site removing the dead leg.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific requirements listed.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for fire risk assessment works at Broadlea Primary School is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks detailed requirements and evaluation criteria, and the submission process could be more streamlined.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements with a clear procedure, proper CPV code, and no reported disputes. Deadlines appear reasonable for the scope, though the submission deadline could be tighter given the contract start date. Regulatory compliance is assumed but not explicitly detailed.

Clarity80/100

The description of works is clear, outlining the creation of fire compartments, compliant fire doors, a new kitchen fire shutter, and water supply removal. However, the absence of specific eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements leaves significant ambiguity for potential bidders.

No specific eligibility requirements listed
No specific technical capability requirements listed
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. However, the lack of detailed requirements and the unavailability of document content significantly detract from its completeness.

No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is open, and the value is disclosed, promoting fairness. The absence of tailored requirements for specific companies is positive. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to understand how their submissions will be assessed, potentially impacting fairness.

No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the absence of explicit mention of e-submission and the lack of document content reduce its practicality for bidders. Financing information is not detailed.

No e-submission
Document URL not provided
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, contributing to high data consistency.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Organization and description provided
Estimated value and contract duration disclosed
CPV code provided

Concerns

Lack of specific eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements
Absence of evaluation criteria
No document content available
No explicit mention of e-submission

Recommendations

1. Provide detailed eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements.
2. Clearly define evaluation criteria for bidders.
3. Make tender documents readily accessible with content summaries or direct URLs.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline