Skip to main content
Tenders

Cyclical supply of vegetables and fruits for the dietary needs of the Railway Sanatorium in Nałęczów

Open
Deadline
6 days left
April 02, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
2026/BZP 00170893/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Lubelskie, Poland
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 25, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 26, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 02, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
Not specified
Location
Lubelskie
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€273,554
Avg. Bids
0.2
Competition
Low
SME Winners
94%
23,646 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Cyclical supply of vegetables and fruits for the dietary needs of the Railway Sanatorium in Nałęczów

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No information on submission requirements]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No information on mandatory exclusion grounds]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No information on eligibility requirements]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No information on technical capability requirements]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No information on financial requirements]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

2 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de8a5c-d1fc-711b-056e-e50001aab58e.pdf

This document contains a public procurement notice for the cyclical supply of vegetables and fruits for the nutrition needs of the Railway Sanatorium Hospital in Nałęczów, Poland.

SWZ owoce i warzywa.docxDOC
SWZ owoce i warzywa.docx

This document contains the terms of reference for a tender issued by the Railway Sanatorium Hospital in Nałęczów for the cyclical supply of fruits and vegetables for its nutritional needs.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for cyclical supply of fruits and vegetables is generally well-structured with available documentation, but lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and financial aspects, and has a very short submission deadline.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements with a proper CPV code and active status. However, the extremely short submission deadline (7 days) raises concerns about reasonable timelines, potentially impacting legal compliance with fair competition principles. The absence of a 'reveal date' is a minor procedural oversight.

Extremely short submission deadline (7 days)
Clarity80/100

The tender title and description are clear, and the CPV code is appropriate. The availability of the Terms of Reference (SWZ) document provides a good basis for understanding the scope. However, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria is a significant clarity issue.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Essential information such as title, reference, organization, and CPV code are present. Several key documents are attached, including the price form, terms of reference, and contract template. However, crucial financial details (estimated value) and contract duration are not disclosed, impacting overall completeness.

Estimated value not disclosed
Contract duration not specified
Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, which promotes fairness. The CPV code is standard, and there are no immediately apparent requirements tailored to specific companies. However, the lack of disclosed evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to understand how their submissions will be assessed, potentially impacting fairness.

Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality65/100

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', suggesting an electronic submission process. However, the 'Checks' section notes 'No e-submission', which is contradictory and needs clarification. The absence of a contract start date and financing information further reduces practicality.

Contradictory information on e-submission
Missing contract start date
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and CPV are populated. The tender status is active, and there are no reported disputes. The dates provided (submission deadline) are logical within the context of an active tender. The absence of a 'reveal date' is a minor inconsistency.

Missing reveal date
Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is not indicated as EU-funded. This suggests a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and description
Appropriate CPV code provided
Key tender documents available
E-procurement indicated

Concerns

Extremely short submission deadline
Missing evaluation criteria
Undisclosed estimated value and contract duration
Lack of sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Extend the submission deadline to allow adequate preparation time.
2. Clearly define and publish the evaluation criteria.
3. Disclose the estimated contract value and duration.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline