Skip to main content
Tenders

Execution of roof renovations

Open
Deadline
10 days left
April 07, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
2026/BZP 00157376/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Śląskie, Poland
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 17, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 31, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 07, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
4 months
Location
Śląskie
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€12,641,706
Avg. Bids
0.1
Competition
Low
SME Winners
86%
133,693 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Execution of roof renovations

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No information
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No information

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

11 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de83ef-4aed-c0c3-056e-e500011b63e3.pdf

This document contains a public procurement notice for roofing renovation works issued by Zakład Komunalny "PGM" in Chorzów, Poland, requiring electronic submission of bids.

PR_Bałtycka 8.pdfPDF
PR_Bałtycka 8.pdf -- 287.9 KB

No content extracted

PR_gagarina 33.pdfPDF
PR_gagarina 33.pdf -- 262.5 KB

No content extracted

PR_jubileuszowa 8.pdfPDF
PR_jubileuszowa 8.pdf -- 257.8 KB

No content extracted

STWiORB - roboty dekarskie.docxDOC
STWiORB - roboty dekarskie.docx -- 36.6 KB

No content extracted

SWZ - dachy.pdfPDF
SWZ - dachy.pdf -- 318.6 KB

No content extracted

Zał. nr 2 do SWZ.docDOC
Zał. nr 2 do SWZ.doc -- 97.5 KB

No content extracted

Zał. nr 3 do SWZ.docDOC
Zał. nr 3 do SWZ.doc -- 87.5 KB

No content extracted

Zał. nr 4 do SWZ.docDOC
Zał. nr 4 do SWZ.doc -- 86.5 KB

No content extracted

Zał. nr 5 do SWZ.docDOC
Zał. nr 5 do SWZ.doc -- 171.5 KB

No content extracted

Zał. nr 5 do SWZ.pdfPDF
Zał. nr 5 do SWZ.pdf -- 127.0 KB

No content extracted

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for roofing renovation works is generally well-structured but lacks crucial details regarding evaluation criteria and financial information, impacting its completeness and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements with a clear CPV code and a specified submission deadline. However, the absence of a reveal date and explicit evaluation criteria could lead to procedural ambiguities.

Missing reveal date
No evaluation criteria specified
Clarity80/100

The title and description are clear, and the CPV code is correctly provided. The tender notice offers a basic summary. However, the lack of detailed requirements in the AI-extracted sections and the unsummarized document content hinder full understanding.

Completeness70/100

Essential information such as the title, reference, organization, and deadline is present. The contract duration is specified. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and critical requirements (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, submission) are missing, significantly impacting completeness.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
Mandatory Exclusion Grounds: No information
Fairness85/100

The tender is characterized by e-procurement and is divided into parts, promoting accessibility. However, the undisclosed estimated value and the absence of specified objective evaluation criteria raise concerns about fairness and transparency.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender specifies e-procurement, which is a positive aspect. However, the contract start date is not provided, and the financing information is absent. The short submission deadline might also pose a practical challenge.

Contract start date: Not specified
Financing information: Missing
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical. The primary inconsistency lies in the missing information within the AI-extracted requirements sections.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Organization and CPV code specified
E-Procurement enabled
Documents available

Concerns

Undisclosed estimated value
Missing evaluation criteria
Lack of detailed requirements (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, submission)
Short submission deadline

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
2. Clearly define objective evaluation criteria for bids.
3. Provide detailed information for all mandatory requirements (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, submission).

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline