Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Lincoln College Loft Insulation - Abbey Building, Friary Building and Temple Building

Open
Deadline
27 days left
April 24, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
023101-2026
Value
Not disclosed
Location
South Yorkshire, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 13, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 17, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 24, 2026

Contract Start Date

June 28, 2026

Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
2 months
Location
South Yorkshire
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Salix PSDS Phase 4 - Lincoln College Loft Insulation - Abbey Building, Friary Building and Temple Building

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for loft insulation at Lincoln College is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and specified requirements. However, the lack of disclosed financial value and detailed evaluation criteria slightly impacts completeness and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard open procedure requirements, including a clear CPV code and NUTS code. Deadlines appear reasonable for the scope. No disputes are noted. The primary concern is the missing reveal date, which is a minor procedural oversight.

Missing reveal date
Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, and the AI-extracted requirements outline the necessary categories for submission. The conditions for participation are generally documented, although specific evaluation criteria are absent.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the organization, reference, and timeline details. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission for potential bidders. The number of attached documents is stated, but their content is not accessible.

Estimated value not disclosed
No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is open, and the procedure is clearly defined. The division into parts is a positive aspect for fairness. However, the lack of disclosed financial value and specific evaluation criteria could be perceived as less transparent, though no specific company tailoring is evident.

Value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality65/100

The contract duration and start date are specified. However, the absence of information regarding e-submission and the URL for documents limits practical accessibility for bidders. Financing information is also not detailed.

No e-submission
Document URL not provided
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The timeline appears consistent within itself.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of focus on these areas.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Organization and description provided
CPV code and NUTS code specified
Requirements categories outlined
Divided into parts

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
No evaluation criteria specified
No document content available
No e-submission indicated
Lack of sustainability focus

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated financial value of the contract.
2. Provide detailed evaluation criteria for submissions.
3. Clarify the e-submission process and provide direct links to tender documents.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline