Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

2024-133 RIIO-3 Independent Technical Adviser

Open
Deadline
10 days left
April 14, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
028673-2026
Value
£25,000,000
Location
United Kingdom
Published
March 28, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 27, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 07, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 14, 2026

Contract Start Date

June 29, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£25,000,000
Duration
60 months
Location
United Kingdom
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Ofgem is seeking to appoint up to three organisations to fulfil the role of Independent Technical Adviser (ITA) as part of a framework agreement. The ITA will be an independent body responsible for providing assurance to Ofgem on the design, procurement, cost and overall delivery of selected load‑related projects across all electricity Transmission Owners (TOs). The objective of ITA assurance is to support enhanced and accelerated regulatory decision‑making and processes. Further information can be found in the attached ITT document.

Risk Analysis

Risk analysis is not yet available for this country's tenders. Currently supported: Estonia, Poland, Lithuania, and Latvia.

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[Requirement details to be extracted from ITT document]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[Requirement details to be extracted from ITT document]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[Requirement details to be extracted from ITT document]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[Requirement details to be extracted from ITT document]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[Requirement details to be extracted from ITT document]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

Get AI-generated summaries of all tender documents. Quickly understand what each document contains without reading hundreds of pages — covering scope, conditions, evaluation criteria, and key obligations.

Login
75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for Independent Technical Adviser services by Ofgem is generally well-structured, with clear objectives and a disclosed value. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and document content, impacting completeness and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to open procedure and provides a CPV code. Deadlines are present, though the submission deadline might be considered tight given the complexity implied by the attached ITT document. No disputes are reported, suggesting regulatory compliance.

Submission deadline may be too short relative to the scope of work.
Clarity80/100

The description clearly outlines the role of the Independent Technical Adviser and the objective of the procurement. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves a gap in understanding how proposals will be assessed.

Missing evaluation criteria.
Completeness70/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and duration are present. The main issue is the lack of accessible content for the tender documents, preventing a full assessment of requirements.

No document content available for detailed review of requirements.
Mandatory exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements are placeholders, requiring access to the ITT document.
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, indicating a fair process. The value is disclosed, and the criteria for selection are expected to be objective, though not explicitly stated in the summary. The process appears to be e-procurement enabled, which promotes fairness.

Practicality65/100

While the contract start date and duration are specified, the lack of accessible document content and the absence of explicit e-submission details (beyond the general procedure type) reduce practicality. Financing information is not detailed.

No e-submission details provided.
Financing information not specified.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. No suspensions or disputes are noted, contributing to high data consistency.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding in the provided information, indicating a lack of focus on these areas.

Not green procurement.
No social criteria mentioned.

Strengths

Clear title and reference number.
Organization and description are well-defined.
Estimated value and contract duration are disclosed.
CPV code provided.
Open procedure indicates a fair process.

Concerns

Lack of accessible content for tender documents.
Missing explicit evaluation criteria.
Potential for a tight submission deadline.
No explicit sustainability or innovation focus.

Recommendations

1. Ensure all tender documents are readily accessible to potential bidders.
2. Clearly specify evaluation criteria to enhance transparency and fairness.
3. Consider extending the submission deadline if the ITT document is extensive.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline