Skip to main content
Tenders

Bespoke Chart paper supply

Open
Deadline
41 days left
May 07, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
027491-2026
Value
£2,216,000
Location
Dorset and Somerset, United Kingdom
Published
March 19, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 25, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 30, 2026

Submission Deadline

May 07, 2026

Contract Start Date

December 01, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£2,216,000
Duration
48 months
Location
Dorset and Somerset
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

The re-procurement of a Supplier to manufacture, store and supply bespoke watermarked paper. For more information about this opportunity, please visit the Delta eSourcing portal at: https://www.delta-esourcing.com/tenders/UK-UK-Taunton:-Printing-paper./W4642Z7369 To respond to this opportunity, please click here: https://www.delta-esourcing.com/respond/W4642Z7369

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--*
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--*
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--*
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--*
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--*

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for bespoke chart paper supply is generally well-structured, with clear financial information and a defined duration. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on mandatory requirements, impacting its overall clarity and completeness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to open procedure and provides a CPV code. Deadlines are present, though the submission deadline might be considered short relative to the contract start date. No disputes are reported. Regulatory compliance is assumed but not explicitly detailed.

Clarity80/100

The description of the service is clear, and the estimated value is disclosed. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria and detailed mandatory/eligibility/technical/financial requirements makes it difficult for potential bidders to fully understand the assessment process.

Missing evaluation criteria
AI-extracted requirements are placeholders
Completeness70/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration are present. However, the lack of content in the tender documents and the placeholder nature of AI-extracted requirements mean crucial details are missing, impacting completeness.

No document content available
AI-extracted requirements are placeholders
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, suggesting broad access. The value is disclosed, and the deadline is provided. The use of an e-sourcing portal for access and response promotes fairness. However, the lack of specified objective criteria for evaluation could be a concern.

Practicality65/100

The tender provides a URL for accessing more information and responding. The contract start date and duration are specified. Financing information is not explicitly detailed, and the submission process relies on an external portal which is standard but not directly integrated.

No e-submission (relies on external portal)
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The timeline between submission deadline and contract start is reasonable.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding, which are common elements in modern tenders. This suggests a lack of focus on these areas.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Organization and estimated value disclosed
Open procedure with e-sourcing portal access
Contract duration and start date specified

Concerns

Missing specific evaluation criteria
No content available for tender documents
AI-extracted requirements are placeholders
Lack of sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Provide detailed evaluation criteria for transparency.
2. Upload full content for all tender documents.
3. Incorporate sustainability and innovation aspects if applicable.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline