Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Radiology Ventilation Replacement Works at South Tyneside District Hospital

Open
Deadline
19 days left
April 16, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
024308-2026
Value
£120,000
Location
Northumberland and Tyne and Wear, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 17, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 09, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 16, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 31, 2026

Budget
£120,000
Duration
10 months
Location
Northumberland and Tyne and Wear
Type
Open Procedure
74
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Replacement Ventilation plant including mechanical services enabling works located at South Tyneside District Hospital

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

74
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for radiology ventilation replacement works is generally well-structured with clear basic information and disclosed financial value. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and access to tender document content, impacting its overall transparency and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with basic regulatory requirements, including a proper CPV code and no disclosed disputes. Deadlines are present, though their adequacy is subjective. The procedure is identified as 'Below threshold - open competition'.

Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear and concise. The mandatory exclusion and eligibility requirements are listed, indicating a structured approach to candidate selection. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria is a notable gap.

Missing evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information such as title, reference, organization, and estimated value is present. Contract duration and start date are specified. However, only 4 tender documents are listed with no available content or summaries, significantly hindering a thorough review.

No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open competition, suggesting fairness. The estimated value is disclosed, and the criteria for eligibility are listed generically. The lack of specific evaluation criteria prevents a full assessment of objective selection, but no overtly tailored requirements are evident.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies contract start and duration, and financing is implied by the estimated value. However, the absence of e-submission and the lack of accessible tender document content reduce its practical usability for potential bidders.

No e-submission
No document content available
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, dates, and value are consistently populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The timeline appears logical within the context of a below-threshold procurement.

Sustainability40/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of emphasis on sustainability elements.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Organization and description provided
Estimated value and CPV code disclosed
Open competition procedure

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
No tender document content available
No e-submission requirement
Lack of sustainability focus

Recommendations

1. Provide detailed evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and fairness.
2. Make the full content of tender documents accessible to potential bidders.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability criteria into future tenders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline