Skip to main content
Tenders

Reconstruction of the road Meņģele – Šoseja P27 in Lejasciems parish, Gulbene municipality

Open
Deadline
25 days left
April 21, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
168770
Value
€150,000
Location
Vidzeme, Latvia
Published
March 22, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 22, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 14, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 21, 2026

Tender Opening

April 21, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€150,000
Duration
6 months
Location
Vidzeme
Type
Construction
71
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€491,981
Avg. Bids
3.0
Competition
Low
SME Winners
99%
20,606 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Reconstruction of the road Meņģele – Šoseja P27 in Lejasciems parish, Gulbene municipality
EU Funded

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

7 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--[Specific submission requirements to be detailed in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija']
--[Bidder must adhere to the regulations outlined in 'Nolikums']
--[Bidder must comply with the contract terms outlined in 'Līguma projekts']
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[Specific exclusion grounds to be detailed in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija']
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[Specific eligibility requirements to be detailed in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija']
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[Specific technical capability requirements to be detailed in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija']
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[Specific financial requirements to be detailed in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija']

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
168770_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260322115441.pdf -- 97.3 KB

This document outlines the tender requirements, including exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical and financial proposal requirements, and other necessary documents for the reconstruction of the Meņģele – P27 highway in Gulbene municipality.

Līguma projektsDOC
8_pielikums_Iepirkuma_liguma_projekts.doc -- 232.0 KB

This document contains a draft contract for the reconstruction of a road in Gulbene municipality, outlining the subject of the contract, payment terms, and execution requirements.

NolikumsDOC
Nolikums_GNP_2026_22.doc -- 220.5 KB

This document contains the regulations for an open tender procedure for the reconstruction of the Meņģele-Šoseja P27 road in Gulbene municipality.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for an open tender for the reconstruction of the Meņģele – Šoseja P27 road in Gulbene municipality, Latvia, with a submission deadline of April 21, 2026.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

71
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for road reconstruction in Gulbene municipality is moderately complete and clear, with good data consistency. However, concerns exist regarding document access and the specification of evaluation criteria. Sustainability aspects are lacking.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender exhibits reasonable compliance with legal requirements. Deadlines are clearly specified and appear reasonable for the scope. The procedure is open, and a proper CPV code is provided. No disputes are reported, contributing to a good score. However, the lack of explicit evaluation criteria slightly impacts this category.

Missing explicit evaluation criteria.
Clarity70/100

The description of the works is clear, and essential documents like the contract draft and regulations are referenced. However, the AI-extracted requirements indicate that crucial details regarding exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements are deferred to external documents ('Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija'), potentially impacting the clarity for bidders unfamiliar with these specific documents.

Detailed requirements are deferred to external documents.
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, duration, and deadlines. Key documents like the contract draft, regulations, and requirements are indicated as attached or available. However, the precise content of 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija' is not fully elaborated within the main notice, leaving some aspects of completeness dependent on accessing and interpreting this separate document.

Detailed exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements are not fully detailed in the main tender notice.
Fairness75/100

The tender is an open procedure, and key information like the estimated value is disclosed. The use of e-procurement suggests a degree of fairness. However, the flagged issue of 'Restricted document access' is a significant concern, as it may limit the ability of all potential bidders to fully assess the tender. The absence of specified evaluation criteria also raises questions about objective assessment.

Restricted document access noted.
No evaluation criteria specified.
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is a positive aspect for practicality. The contract duration and tender validity are specified. However, the 'Restricted document access' and the reliance on external documents for key requirements ('Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija') reduce overall practicality. Information on financing beyond 'EU Funded' is not detailed.

Restricted document access impedes practical assessment.
Detailed requirements are in separate, potentially less accessible documents.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are consistently populated and logical. The tender status is active, and no disputes are reported, indicating good internal consistency of the provided data. Dates for reveal, submission, and opening are logically ordered.

Sustainability40/100

The tender is flagged as 'EU Funded,' which may imply adherence to certain EU directives that incorporate sustainability. However, there is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender information, leading to a lower score in this category.

No explicit green procurement criteria mentioned.
No explicit social or innovation aspects highlighted.

Strengths

Clear title, reference, and organization details.
Estimated value and contract duration are specified.
Open procedure and e-procurement utilized.
Logical and consistent timeline with reasonable deadlines.

Concerns

Restricted document access.
Missing explicit evaluation criteria.
Key detailed requirements are deferred to external documents.
Lack of explicit sustainability or innovation focus.

Recommendations

1. Ensure all tender documents are fully accessible to all potential bidders.
2. Clearly define and publish the evaluation criteria within the main tender notice.
3. Consider incorporating explicit sustainability and innovation criteria in future tenders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline