Road marking works on streets in Smiltene municipality

This tender for road marking works in Smiltenes novads is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and available documentation. However, the undisclosed estimated value and lack of explicit evaluation criteria are notable concerns.

The tender appears to comply with general public procurement law, including the use of a proper CPV code and an open procedure. Deadlines are reasonable. No disputes are reported. The main concern is the lack of disclosed estimated value, which can impact legal compliance regarding transparency.

The description of the works is clear, and the requirements are documented in the provided appendices. The eligibility, technical, and financial requirements are specified. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity.

Most basic information is present, including the organization, type of works, and contract duration. Key documents like the financial offer template and regulations are attached. However, the estimated value is missing, which is a significant piece of information.

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which promotes fairness. The requirements are generally objective, focusing on legal status, experience, and technical capability. The main concern is the restricted access to some documents, which could limit full document access for potential bidders.

The tender is active and uses e-procurement. The contract duration is specified. However, the lack of a direct URL for document access and the absence of financing information reduce its practicality.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. The CPV code and NUTS code are provided.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation in the tender. It is not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.