Skip to main content
Tenders

Keystone Academy Trust - ICT Managed Service

Open
Deadline
10 days left
April 07, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
016679-2026
Value
£1,800,000
Location
North East England, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 24, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 31, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 07, 2026

Contract Start Date

December 22, 2026

Budget
£1,800,000
Duration
60 months
Location
North East England
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

A full outsourced managed service for 7 primary schools Delivery of relevant project work Education support service to train users

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for an ICT Managed Service for primary schools is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and financial details. However, it lacks crucial details regarding evaluation criteria and document content, impacting its overall quality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, with a clear CPV code and no reported disputes. The procedure is competitive. However, the absence of a reveal date for the tender documents is a minor procedural oversight.

Missing reveal date for tender documents
Clarity80/100

The description of the service required is clear, outlining the need for a full outsourced managed service for 7 primary schools, including project work and user training. The AI-extracted requirements list key areas to be addressed by bidders.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, contract duration, and start date. However, the critical issue of missing tender document content significantly hinders completeness, as bidders cannot fully understand the scope and specific requirements without them.

No tender document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is open and uses a competitive flexible procedure, suggesting a fair process. The value is disclosed, and the criteria are expected to be objective. The lack of specific company tailoring is positive. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to understand how their submissions will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the lack of information regarding e-submission and the absence of a direct URL for documents reduce its practicality for potential bidders.

No e-submission specified
No direct URL for documents
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, indicating good data consistency.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title, reference, and organization details
Estimated value and contract duration specified
CPV code provided
Open and competitive procedure

Concerns

Missing tender document content
No evaluation criteria specified
Lack of e-submission details
No explicit sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Provide full content for all tender documents.
2. Clearly specify the evaluation criteria and their weighting.
3. Clarify the e-submission process and provide direct links to documents.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline