Skip to main content
Tenders

Procurement of vehicles for the State Police

Open
Deadline
3 days left
March 30, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
161279
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Riga, Latvia
Published
February 25, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Financial ProposalPrice
Technical SpecificationsTechnical
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 25, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 23, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 30, 2026

Tender Opening

March 30, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
7 months
Location
Riga
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€168,348
Avg. Bids
1.9
Competition
Low
SME Winners
99%
4,060 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Procurement of vehicles for the State Police

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

6 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (2)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must complete and submit the bid application form.
--Bidders must adhere to the deadline of 2026-03-30T10:00:00.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must provide information about convictions and self-cleaning measures as per the ESPD.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must confirm adherence to tender rules and legal requirements.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must meet the technical specifications for the vehicles.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must submit a financial proposal.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
161279_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260225051354.pdf -- 100.2 KB

This document outlines the requirements for bidders participating in a tender for the procurement of vehicles for the State Police, detailing exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical specifications, and financial proposal requirements.

ESPDXML
espd-request_2025_124.xml -- 139.4 KB

This document contains a European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) request concerning participation in a criminal organization, requiring bidders to provide information about convictions and self-cleaning measures.

NolikumsZIP
NOLIKUMS.zip -- 1.5 MB

This document contains a bid application form for the "Procurement of Vehicles for the State Police Needs" tender, requiring bidders to confirm adherence to tender rules and legal requirements.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for a public procurement tender for the purchase of vehicles for the State Police, including identification numbers, deadlines, and procurement subject.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for vehicle procurement for the State Police is generally well-structured with clear requirements and a reasonable timeline. However, the lack of disclosed value and specific evaluation criteria are notable concerns.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard procurement procedures, including the use of CPV codes and a clear open procedure. Deadlines appear reasonable. The presence of mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements indicates a focus on regulatory compliance. No disputes are reported.

Clarity80/100

The description of the procurement subject is clear. Technical specifications are referenced in a dedicated document, and the ESPD and bid application form are provided, contributing to clarity. However, the absence of explicitly stated evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity regarding how bids will be assessed.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the organization, reference number, and a clear description. Deadlines and contract duration are specified. Four tender documents are available, covering key aspects like technical specifications and application forms. The estimated value is not disclosed, which impacts completeness.

Estimated value not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure with e-procurement characteristics, promoting fairness. The disclosure of the ESPD and technical specifications allows bidders to understand requirements. The lack of disclosed value could be a minor concern for some bidders, but the criteria are generally objective. Document access is flagged as restricted, which is a concern.

Restricted document access
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is a positive aspect for practical submission. A contract start date is not explicitly mentioned, but the duration is provided. Financing information is absent. The submission deadline is clear.

Financing information missing
Contract start date not explicitly stated
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. The dates provided (reveal, submission, opening) are logically sequenced. No suspensions or disputes are indicated, contributing to data consistency.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.

No green procurement mentioned
No social criteria mentioned

Strengths

Clear open procedure
E-procurement utilized
Detailed technical specifications referenced
Mandatory exclusion grounds specified

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Restricted document access
Lack of sustainability criteria

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the procurement.
2. Clearly outline the evaluation criteria for bid assessment.
3. Ensure full and open access to all tender documents.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline