Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Industry Simulation Software

Open
Deadline
13 days left
April 10, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
028455-2026
Value
£75,000
Location
United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 27, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 03, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 10, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 29, 2026

Budget
£75,000
Duration
13 months
Location
United Kingdom
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Industry Simulation Software for UKAEA. Please see PME documents for more information.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for Industry Simulation Software is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and a disclosed value. However, it lacks crucial details regarding evaluation criteria and document content, impacting its overall completeness and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, with a clear CPV code and no reported disputes. The deadline, while potentially short, is specified. The absence of a 'reveal date' is a minor procedural oversight.

Missing reveal date
Clarity80/100

The description of the required software is concise. The AI-extracted requirements list key areas, but the lack of specific evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to fully understand how their submissions will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Essential information such as title, reference, organization, and estimated value is present. However, the critical absence of accessible document content and specified evaluation criteria significantly hinders completeness.

No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender offers full access to basic information and discloses the value. The criteria mentioned (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial) are standard. The lack of specific evaluation criteria could be perceived as a minor fairness concern, but no company-specific tailoring is evident.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the lack of information on e-submission and financing details reduces its practicality for potential bidders. The short submission deadline also poses a practical challenge.

No e-submission
Deadline may be too short
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, indicating good data consistency.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of emphasis on these sustainability factors.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Organization and CPV code specified
Estimated value disclosed
Basic AI-extracted requirements listed

Concerns

Missing document content
No evaluation criteria specified
Lack of e-submission
Short submission deadline
No sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Provide full access to tender documents, including PME documents.
2. Clearly define evaluation criteria for all aspects of the submission.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability aspects and clarifying e-submission procedures.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline