Improvement of water supply and development of water supply network in Tykocin municipality – water meter replacement

This tender for water meter replacement in Tykocin municipality is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a defined scope. However, it lacks crucial details regarding evaluation criteria and financial aspects, impacting its overall completeness and practicality.

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by providing a clear CPV code and a defined procedure. The submission deadline is present, though potentially tight. No explicit disputes or regulatory non-compliance issues are apparent from the provided data.

The description of the service (water meter replacement) is clear, and the CPV code is specific. The presence of multiple attached documents suggests a structured approach to detailing requirements, although specific evaluation criteria are missing.

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, and a submission deadline. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and crucial details like contract duration and specific eligibility/technical/financial requirements are absent, leaving significant gaps.

The tender appears fair by making all documents accessible and using e-procurement. The lack of disclosed value and specific, potentially tailored, requirements suggests a reasonable level of fairness. However, the absence of disclosed evaluation criteria could be a concern.

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is a positive aspect. However, the absence of a contract start date, financing information, and contract duration significantly hinders practical assessment and planning for potential bidders. The deadline also appears short.

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and CPV code are populated. The dates are logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The tender status is active.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender details. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.