Skip to main content
Tenders

GMCA 1134 North West Community Flood Resilience Engagement Support Services

Open
Deadline
11 days left
April 08, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
023771-2026
Value
£2,880,000
Location
North West England, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 16, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 01, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 08, 2026

Contract Start Date

July 31, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£2,880,000
Duration
36 months
Location
North West England
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Greater Manchester Combined Authority (GMCA), supported by the North West Regional Flood and Coastal Committee (RFCC), is seeking market insight to shape a future procurement for a regional service aimed at increasing community resilience to flooding and coastal change. The service provider will act as a neutral, independent intermediary, supporting both communities and flood risk management authorities (RMAs) across the North West. Flooding remains one of the most significant climate-related risks facing the region. Traditional engineering approaches are increasingly costly, complex, and insufficient on their own. Communities must therefore be better informed, prepared, and supported to understand their flood risk, plan for emergencies, build resilience, and recover effectively when flooding occurs. We can help communities to become more resilient to better protect themselves and enable quicker recovery, but only by successfully engaging with them on their terms, at the right time, and through the channels they use. Across the North West there are hundreds of communities which are at risk from flooding from rivers and the sea. Combined with surface water flooding, the number of residents and businesses at risk is significantly higher. Climate change will continue to increase rainfall and flooding. The procurement will establish a multi-strand community engagement and resilience-building service, spanning direct community engagement, digital communications, educational materials, and the development and maintenance of The Flood Hub website as a central public information platform. GMCA will lead the procurement and enter into contractual arrangements with the selected supplier. The service will be funded predominantly by the North West RFCC, with contributions from the Environment Agency and other partners as required. The supplier will support North West flood RMAs including 36 local authorities, the Environment Agency, and United Utilities, as the primary water company. The service provider will act as a neutral intermediary organisation operating in the space between communities who have flooded, or who are at risk of flooding, and RMAs, across the North West of England, supporting those authorities to increase the resilience of those communities to flooding and coastal change. The communities to be supported include residents (homeowners and tenants) and businesses, including agricultural. Key Objectives The service aims to achieve the following outcomes: • Increased community resilience to flooding and coastal change through adapted engagement approaches to improve their understanding of flood risk, including where and why flooding may occur. • Improved preparedness at individual and community levels, including awareness of emergency actions, insurance, and property resilience measures. • Greater community contribution to community-level flood risk management interventions (e.g. sustainable drainage, rain gardens, natural flood management). • Strengthened community capability to develop and maintain community flood groups, action plans, and mutual aid structures. • Enhanced recovery outcomes, enabling households and businesses to recover more quickly following flooding. • Greater awareness and uptake of national and local support mechanisms, including property flood resilience, flood warnings, and online resources such as The Flood Hub. The Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) (TUPE) Regulations are expected to apply to this commission, requiring the team of five FTEs who have resourced the service through the previous contract, to transfer across to a new supplier organisation if selected

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

20 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (5)
Technical (12)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific submission requirements mentioned in the provided text.]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific mandatory exclusion grounds mentioned in the provided text.]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Must be able to provide services across the North West of England.
--Must act as a neutral, independent intermediary.
--Must be able to support flood risk management authorities (RMAs) including 36 local authorities, the Environment Agency, and United Utilities.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS12
--Ability to develop and maintain The Flood Hub website as a central public information platform.
--Ability to deliver a multi-strand community engagement and resilience-building service.
--Expertise in direct community engagement.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific financial requirements mentioned in the provided text. The value is 2880000 EUR and duration is 36 months.]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender is in the planning stage, seeking market insight for community flood resilience support services. It is well-structured with clear objectives and requirements, though some administrative details and evaluation criteria are missing.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender is in the planning phase, which inherently limits a full assessment of legal compliance. The CPV code is provided, and the organization is clearly identified. The absence of a 'Procedure' type and 'Liable Person' suggests it's an early-stage notice. Deadlines are present but the submission deadline is relatively short given the planning status.

Procedure type not specified
Liable Person not specified
Clarity80/100

The description of the service, objectives, and target audience is clear and comprehensive. The AI-extracted requirements are well-defined, providing a good understanding of the expected capabilities. However, evaluation criteria are not specified, which is a significant omission.

Evaluation criteria not specified
Completeness70/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration are present. The description is detailed. However, there are no attached documents or summaries of documents, and the 'Type' and 'Procedure' fields are empty, indicating incomplete administrative data.

No tender documents attached or summarized
Type of procedure not specified
Fairness85/100

The tender appears fair, with a clear disclosure of estimated value and contract duration. The requirements are objective and focused on service delivery capabilities. The mention of TUPE regulations is a standard practice and not indicative of unfair tailoring. Access to full documents is currently limited.

Full document access is not yet available
Practicality65/100

The tender is in the planning stage, so e-submission details are not yet available. The contract start date and duration are specified. Financing is mentioned as predominantly from RFCC with contributions from others. The lack of specific submission requirements and available documents impacts immediate practicality.

No e-submission details provided (expected for planning stage)
No specific submission requirements detailed
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided (submission deadline, contract start) are sequential and reasonable for a planning notice.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding. While the service itself contributes to climate resilience, these specific procurement characteristics are not highlighted.

No explicit mention of green procurement
No explicit mention of social criteria

Strengths

Clear and detailed service description and objectives
Well-defined technical and eligibility requirements
Estimated value and contract duration clearly stated
CPV code provided

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
No tender documents available
Short submission deadline for a planning stage notice
Lack of explicit sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Publish detailed evaluation criteria as soon as possible.
2. Ensure all relevant tender documents are made available to potential bidders.
3. Consider extending the submission deadline to allow adequate market engagement.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline