Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
Login7 requirements across 5 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
3 documents available with AI summaries
This document outlines the requirements for a tender concerning the supply of urology and other medical devices and materials for Daugavpils Regional Hospital, including exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical and financial proposal requirements, and evaluation criteria.
This document contains the regulations and attachments for an open tender for the supply of urology and other medical devices and materials, identified as DRS 2026/24.
This document contains the main data for tender DRS 2026/24, an open competition for the supply of urology and other medical devices and materials by Daugavpils Regional Hospital.
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
This tender for medical supplies is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a reasonable timeline. However, concerns exist regarding document access and the specification of evaluation criteria.
The tender adheres to general legal compliance by providing a clear procedure, a proper CPV code, and no reported disputes. Deadlines appear reasonable within the context of an open procedure. Regulatory compliance is assumed unless otherwise indicated.
The description of the tender is clear, and the requirements are documented within the provided files. However, the absence of explicitly specified evaluation criteria in the main notice reduces overall clarity.
Most basic information is present, including deadlines, value, and duration. However, the reliance on external documents for detailed requirements (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, submission) means that not all information is immediately accessible within the main tender notice, impacting perceived completeness.
The tender is an open competition, and the estimated value is disclosed. The use of e-procurement and WTO/GPA characteristics suggests a commitment to fair practices. However, the 'Restricted document access' flag indicates a potential barrier to full transparency for all interested parties.
The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is a positive aspect. However, the lack of explicit mention of e-submission within the provided details and the absence of financing information or a specific contract start date (beyond duration) slightly limit its practicality.
Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, and the dates provided (reveal, submission, opening) are logically sequenced.
The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which limits its score in this category.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required