Skip to main content
Tenders

CAR PARK RESURFACING - WHARF ROAD LEVEL 4

Open
Deadline
10 days left
April 07, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
020784-2026
Value
£300,000
Location
Leicestershire, Rutland and Northamptonshire, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 09, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 31, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 07, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 31, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£300,000
Duration
5 months
Location
Leicestershire, Rutland and Northamptonshire
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

The works consist of asphalting works to replace the asphalt surface on Level 4 of the Wharf Road car park as it has deteriorated, cracked and is in poor condition. The works are required to comply with the lease terms and to maintain the use of the car park for the residents and public using the car park.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

7 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (3)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific requirements listed.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Asphalting works to replace the asphalt surface on Level 4 of the Wharf Road car park.
--Works required to comply with lease terms.
--Works required to maintain the use of the car park for residents and the public.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for car park resurfacing is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks detailed requirements and evaluation criteria, and the submission process is not fully specified.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements with a specified CPV code and a clear procedure for an open competition below the threshold. Deadlines are provided, and there are no reported disputes. The regulatory compliance appears sound for a below-threshold procurement.

Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, outlining the need for asphalting due to deterioration. However, the AI-extracted requirements are very general, and specific technical, financial, and submission requirements are not detailed, impacting the overall clarity of what is expected from bidders.

Lack of specific technical requirements beyond the general scope.
Absence of detailed financial requirements.
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. However, the lack of detailed requirements and the absence of content in the tender documents significantly reduce completeness. The contract start date is specified.

No content available for the 5 tender documents.
Missing specific eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements.
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open competition, which promotes fairness. The estimated value is disclosed, and the procedure is standard. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to understand how their submissions will be assessed, potentially impacting fairness.

No evaluation criteria specified.
Practicality65/100

The tender provides a contract start date and duration. However, the absence of information regarding e-submission and a direct URL for documents limits practicality. Financing information is not explicitly detailed.

No indication of e-submission.
No direct URL for tender documents provided.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no reported suspensions or disputes. The data presented is consistent.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.

No mention of green procurement.
No social aspects considered.

Strengths

Clear title, reference, and organization.
Estimated value and contract duration specified.
CPV code provided.
Open competition procedure.

Concerns

Lack of detailed requirements (technical, financial, submission).
No evaluation criteria specified.
No content available for tender documents.
No e-submission indicated.

Recommendations

1. Provide detailed technical, financial, and submission requirements.
2. Specify clear evaluation criteria for bidders.
3. Upload content for the tender documents and provide a direct URL for access.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline