Skip to main content
Tenders

Purchase, supply and installation of household appliances as part of the project: "Culinary Kutno – improving the quality of vocational training at ZSZ No. 2 in Kutno"

Open
Deadline
7 days left
April 03, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
2026/BZP 00174072/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Łódzkie, Poland
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 26, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 27, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 03, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
24 months
Location
Łódzkie
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€90,670
Avg. Bids
0.4
Competition
Low
SME Winners
94%
20,092 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Purchase, supply and installation of household appliances as part of the project: "Culinary Kutno – improving the quality of vocational training at ZSZ No. 2 in Kutno"

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No information
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No information

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

5 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de8b55-e111-7570-5fad-950001e71617.pdf

This document is a public procurement notice for the purchase, delivery, and installation of household appliances for the "Kulinarne Kutno" project, co-financed by the European Union.

Specyfikacja Warunków Zamówienia -AGD.pdfPDF
Specyfikacja Warunków Zamówienia -AGD.pdf

This document contains the Specification of the Public Procurement Conditions (SWZ) for the purchase, delivery, and installation of household appliances for the "Kulinarne Kutno" project.

załączniki do SWZ od nr 1 do nr 5 - AGD.docxDOC
załączniki do SWZ od nr 1 do nr 5 - AGD.docx

This document contains attachments numbered 1 through 5 to the Specification of Contract Award Conditions (SWZ) for the procurement, delivery, and installation of household appliances.

Załącznik_nr_1a.docxDOC
Załącznik_nr_1a.docx

This document contains a price and assortment form for the purchase, delivery, and installation of household appliances for the "Kulinarne Kutno" project, specifying requirements for equivalent products and pricing.

Załącznik nr 6 - Wzór umowy.docxDOC
Załącznik nr 6 - Wzór umowy.docx

This document contains the draft contract for the purchase, delivery, and installation of household appliances as part of the "Kulinarne Kutno" project.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for household appliances is generally well-structured with clear documentation, but lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on financing, impacting its overall practicality and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by providing a clear CPV code and a defined procedure. However, the absence of a reveal date and specified evaluation criteria could pose minor legal risks. The submission deadline, while short, is within typical parameters for this type of procurement.

Missing reveal date
Clarity80/100

The tender's description is clear regarding the subject matter and the project it supports. The attached documents, including the Specification of Contract Award Conditions (SWZ) and draft contract, provide detailed information. However, the lack of explicit evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the organization, title, and CPV code. The contract duration is specified. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and crucial details regarding eligibility, technical, and financial requirements are missing from the AI-extracted section, suggesting they might be buried within the documents or absent.

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing eligibility requirements
Fairness85/100

The tender is accessible via e-procurement, and the value is not classified, promoting transparency. The criteria for selection are not explicitly stated, which could be a concern for fairness. However, there are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies.

No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender is active and has a clear submission deadline. The contract duration is defined. However, the lack of disclosed financing information and the absence of explicit e-submission details (beyond 'E-Procurement' characteristic) reduce its practicality. The short submission deadline also impacts practicality.

Value not disclosed
No e-submission details
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference number, organization, and CPV code are populated. The dates are logical, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. The contract duration is consistent with the project scope.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. While it is EU funded, this is a general characteristic rather than a specific sustainability focus within the tender's requirements.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear CPV code and description
Comprehensive set of attached documents (SWZ, draft contract)
Active e-procurement process
EU funding mentioned

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
Estimated value not disclosed
Short submission deadline
Lack of explicit sustainability criteria

Recommendations

1. Specify evaluation criteria clearly.
2. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
3. Consider extending the submission deadline or ensuring adequate time for bidders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline