Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Tender for sandblasting and vacuum extraction Energnist Esbjerg

Open
Deadline
13 days left
April 16, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
4f1ae3c4-76ee-439b-ae66-a033b033be3e
Value
kr2,800,000
Location
Syddanmark, Denmark
Published
March 27, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 13, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 09, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 16, 2026

Budget
kr2,800,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Syddanmark
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Tender for sandblasting and vacuum extraction Energnist Esbjerg

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific submission requirements are detailed in the provided text.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific eligibility requirements are detailed in the provided text.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific technical capability requirements are detailed in the provided text.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements are detailed in the provided text.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

Get AI-generated summaries of all tender documents. Quickly understand what each document contains without reading hundreds of pages — covering scope, conditions, evaluation criteria, and key obligations.

Login
75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a disclosed value. However, it lacks detailed requirements and evaluation criteria, impacting completeness and clarity.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with basic legal requirements, including a proper CPV code and an active status. The procedure type is listed as 'competition' but the specific procedure is 'None', which is a minor inconsistency. Deadlines are provided, but their reasonableness is questionable given the short timeframe. No disputes are reported.

Procedure type 'competition' with specific procedure 'None' is inconsistent.
Clarity80/100

The title and description are clear regarding the subject matter (sandblasting and vacuuming). However, the absence of detailed eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements significantly reduces clarity for potential bidders. Evaluation criteria are also missing.

No specific eligibility requirements detailed.
No specific technical capability requirements detailed.
Completeness70/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadline are present. However, crucial details like contract duration, and specific requirements (eligibility, technical, financial, submission) are missing. The availability of tender documents is indicated, but their content is not directly accessible.

Missing contract duration.
No specific mandatory exclusion grounds detailed.
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, which generally promotes fairness. The value is disclosed, and it is an e-procurement process. However, the lack of detailed and objective criteria for evaluation and the absence of specific requirements could lead to subjective assessments. Access to full documents is implied through external links, but direct access to content is not provided.

No evaluation criteria specified.
No specific eligibility requirements detailed.
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is a positive aspect. A link to external tender documents is provided. However, the absence of a contract start date and financing information, along with the missing contract duration, makes it difficult for bidders to fully assess the practical implications. The submission deadline appears very short.

Missing contract start date.
Missing contract duration.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, value, and deadline are populated. The CPV code is provided. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical, with the notice date preceding the submission deadline.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. This suggests a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement.
No social criteria.

Strengths

Clear title and description of services.
Estimated value and CPV code disclosed.
Open procedure and e-procurement utilized.
Reference number and organization clearly identified.

Concerns

Lack of detailed eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements.
Absence of specified evaluation criteria.
Short submission deadline.
Missing contract duration and start date.

Recommendations

1. Provide detailed eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements.
2. Clearly define objective evaluation criteria.
3. Extend the submission deadline to allow adequate preparation.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline