Skip to main content
Tenders

Successive delivery of plastic bags for segregated waste for the needs of PUK sp. z o.o. in Radzyń Podlaski

Open
Deadline
4 days left
March 31, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
2026/BZP 00167087/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Lubelskie, Poland
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 23, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 24, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 31, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
12 months
Location
Lubelskie
Type
Supplies
71
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€291,064
Avg. Bids
0.5
Competition
Low
SME Winners
83%
867 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Successive delivery of plastic bags for segregated waste for the needs of PUK sp. z o.o. in Radzyń Podlaski

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No information
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No information

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

6 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de88d8-09f6-a515-056e-e50001aa9ca0.pdf

This document is a tender notice for the successive delivery of foil bags for segregated waste for PUK sp. z o.o. in Radzyń Podlaski, with the evaluation criterion being solely price.

zaê. nr 1 - Szczegóêowy Opis Przedmiotu Zamówienia.docxDOC
zaê. nr 1 - Szczegóêowy Opis Przedmiotu Zamów... -- 27.1 KB

No content extracted

zaê. nr 2 - oÿw_sukcesywna dostawa worków.docxDOC
zaê. nr 2 - oÿw_sukcesywna dostawa worków.doc... -- 9.9 KB

No content extracted

zaê. nr 3 - FO_sukcesywna dostwa worków.docxDOC
zaê. nr 3 - FO_sukcesywna dostwa worków.docx -- 19.2 KB

No content extracted

zaê. nr 4 - wzór umowy.docxDOC
zaê. nr 4 - wzór umowy.docx -- 33.2 KB

No content extracted

SWZ - sukcesywna dostawa worków-sig.pdfPDF
SWZ - sukcesywna dostawa worków-sig.pdf

This document contains the Specification of the Order Conditions (SWZ) for the successive delivery of plastic bags for segregated waste for the needs of PUK sp. z o.o. in Radzyń Podlaski.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

71
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for foil bags for segregated waste is generally well-structured with accessible documentation. However, it lacks detailed technical and financial requirements, and the evaluation criteria are solely price-based, which could limit competition.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears compliant with general procurement regulations, including CPV codes and organizational details. The procedure type is not specified, which is a minor omission. No disputes are noted.

Clarity70/100

The core service is clear, and the CPV code is specified. However, crucial details regarding technical capabilities, eligibility, and submission requirements are missing from the AI-extracted sections, suggesting these might be buried within the documents.

Missing explicit technical capability requirements
Missing explicit eligibility requirements
Completeness60/100

Basic information like title, organization, and duration is present. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the absence of detailed requirements in the extracted sections raises concerns about overall completeness.

Estimated value not disclosed
AI-extracted requirements are empty
Fairness85/100

The tender is characterized as e-procurement, which promotes fairness. The evaluation criterion is solely price, which is objective but may not be ideal for all procurements. No tailored requirements towards specific companies are apparent.

Evaluation criterion is solely price
Practicality65/100

The tender specifies e-procurement and provides a contract duration. However, the financing information and contract start date are not explicitly stated, and the deadline might be perceived as short for comprehensive preparation given the missing details.

Financing information not explicitly stated
Contract start date not explicitly stated
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference number, organization, and deadline are populated. No disputes or suspensions are indicated, and the dates are logical.

Sustainability40/100

There is no mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. The tender is also not indicated as EU-funded.

No green procurement criteria
No social criteria mentioned

Strengths

Clear title and organization details
CPV code provided
E-procurement process
Accessible documentation

Concerns

Lack of detailed technical and financial requirements
Evaluation based solely on price
Absence of sustainability criteria

Recommendations

1. Consider including detailed technical specifications and financial requirements.
2. Explore incorporating non-price evaluation criteria to ensure best value.
3. Integrate sustainability considerations into the tender.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline