Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
Login6 requirements across 5 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
3 documents available with AI summaries
This document outlines the requirements for a tender concerning the capital repair of water supply systems, including exclusion conditions, selection criteria, and technical and financial proposal evaluation methods.
This document contains the regulations for a public procurement tender for the capital repair of water supply systems, including submission deadlines and requirements.
This document contains the basic data for a tender concerning the capital repair of water supply systems, including details on the contracting authority, subject matter, deadlines, and evaluation criteria.
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
This tender for water supply system repairs is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a reasonable deadline. However, concerns exist regarding document access and the explicit specification of evaluation criteria.
The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including the use of a proper CPV code and an open procedure. Deadlines are reasonable. No disputes are reported. The primary concern is the potential for restricted document access, which could impact legal compliance if not resolved.
The title and description are clear. Mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical, and financial requirements are referenced in attached documents, implying a structured approach. However, the explicit specification of evaluation criteria within the main tender notice is missing, which could lead to ambiguity.
Most basic information is present, including the organization, title, estimated value, and contract duration. Key documents ('Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija' and 'Nolikums') are attached and marked as required. However, the lack of explicit evaluation criteria in the main notice and the potential for restricted document access detract from overall completeness.
The tender utilizes an open procedure and e-procurement, promoting fairness. The estimated value is disclosed. However, the 'Issues' section flags restricted document access, which is a significant concern for fairness as it limits full document access for potential bidders. The absence of explicitly stated evaluation criteria also raises questions about objective assessment.
The tender is active and uses e-procurement. The contract duration is specified. However, the 'Issues' section notes 'No e-submission', which contradicts the 'E-Procurement' characteristic and significantly impacts practicality. Financing information is not explicitly detailed.
Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. The tender status is 'active', and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates appear logical. The CPV code is provided.
The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required