Skip to main content
Tenders

Lincoln College Air Source Heat Pumps and Electrical Upgrades - Abbey Building, Friary Building and Temple Building

Open
Deadline
27 days left
April 24, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
023153-2026
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Lincolnshire, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 13, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 17, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 24, 2026

Contract Start Date

June 28, 2026

Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
14 months
Location
Lincolnshire
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Salix PSDS Phase 4 - Lincoln College Air Source Heat Pumps and Electrical Upgrades - Abbey Building, Friary Building and Temple Building

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for air source heat pumps and electrical upgrades at Lincoln College is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a reasonable process. However, the undisclosed estimated value and lack of explicit evaluation criteria are notable drawbacks.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard open procedure requirements, with a clear CPV code and NUTS code. Deadlines appear reasonable given the scope. No disputes are reported. The procedure is clearly defined as 'Open procedure'.

Clarity80/100

The title and description are specific, detailing the project and locations. Mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements are listed, indicating a structured approach to defining needs.

Completeness70/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, and deadline are present. Contract duration and start date are specified. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the content of the four attached documents is not summarized, impacting overall completeness.

Estimated value not disclosed
No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, suggesting broad access. Key requirements are outlined. The lack of disclosed value is a minor concern for fairness, but the process itself appears objective. No specific company tailoring is evident.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract duration and start date. However, the lack of information regarding e-submission and the URL for documents hinders practical access and submission for potential bidders.

No e-submission specified
Document URL not provided
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and dates are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The timeline appears logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. While the project involves heat pumps which have environmental benefits, these are not highlighted as specific procurement criteria.

Not explicitly green procurement
No social criteria mentioned

Strengths

Clear title and description
Specific CPV and NUTS codes
Defined mandatory requirements
Open procedure

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
No document content available
Missing evaluation criteria
No e-submission specified

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
2. Provide summaries or direct access to the content of the tender documents.
3. Clarify the evaluation criteria for submissions.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline