Skip to main content
Tenders

Construction of facilities for the Selective Collection Point for Municipal Waste in Chorzelów, Mielec Commune.

Open
Deadline
14 days left
April 10, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
2026/BZP 00173603/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Podkarpackie, Poland
Published
March 20, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 26, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 03, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 10, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
Not specified
Location
Podkarpackie
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€12,641,706
Avg. Bids
0.1
Competition
Low
SME Winners
86%
133,693 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Construction of facilities for the Selective Collection Point for Municipal Waste in Chorzelów, Mielec Commune.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

15 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (11)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No information in the text.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No information in the text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information in the text.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS11
--Construction of a warehouse building.
--Construction of 6 storage sheds.
--Construction of an office building.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No information in the text.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

2 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de8b36-7aba-f788-5fad-950001e713a3.pdf

This document is a tender notice for the construction of facilities for a Municipal Selective Waste Collection Point in Chorzelów, Gmina Mielec, Poland.

SZCZEGα¥OWE SPECYFIKACJE TECHNICZNE WYKONANIA I ODBIORU ROBαT BUDOWLANYCH.docDOC
SZCZEGα¥OWE SPECYFIKACJE TECHNICZNE WYKONANIA... -- 348.5 KB

No content extracted

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the construction of waste collection point facilities is generally well-structured, with comprehensive technical documentation. However, it lacks transparency regarding financial details and evaluation criteria, and the submission process could be more streamlined.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal requirements with a clear CPV code and active status. The deadline, while potentially short, is specified. The absence of disputes and suspensions contributes positively. However, the lack of disclosed evaluation criteria is a significant omission.

Missing evaluation criteria specified
Clarity80/100

The description of the required construction works is detailed, supported by numerous technical documents and project specifications. The AI-extracted requirements clearly outline the technical scope. The conditions for contract settlement are also defined.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the title, organization, and a clear description of works. A substantial number of relevant documents are attached. However, crucial financial information (estimated value) is not disclosed, and contract duration is missing.

Estimated Value not disclosed
Missing contract duration
Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, promoting accessibility. The detailed technical specifications and bills of quantities suggest objective criteria for the work itself. However, the lack of disclosed evaluation criteria and the undisclosed estimated value could be perceived as a lack of full transparency.

Value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is a positive aspect. However, the AI-extracted requirements do not explicitly confirm e-submission, and there is no information regarding contract start date or financing details, impacting the overall practicality for potential bidders.

No e-submission explicitly confirmed
Missing contract start date
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference number, organization, and deadline are populated. The CPV code is present, and the status is active. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, and the dates appear logical within the context of the tender.

Sustainability50/100

The tender focuses on construction and waste management infrastructure. There is no explicit mention of green procurement criteria, social aspects, or innovation. The funding source (EU funded) is not specified, limiting the assessment of sustainability integration.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Comprehensive technical documentation and project details
Clear description of construction works
Use of e-procurement
Detailed bills of quantities provided

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Lack of information on contract duration and start date
Limited sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract to enhance transparency.
2. Clearly outline the evaluation criteria for submitted bids.
3. Provide information on the contract start date and duration.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline