Skip to main content
Tenders

MGN214 Repointing, re-rendering and concrete window surround replacement at Whitfield Rd & Bridport Rd, Dorchester

Closed
Deadline
0 days left
March 27, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
019344-2026
Value
£56,000
Location
Dorset and Somerset, United Kingdom
Published
March 19, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 04, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 20, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 27, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 31, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£56,000
Duration
3 months
Location
Dorset and Somerset
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Project Title: Repointing, re-rendering and concrete window surround replacement Location: Whitfield Rd & Bridport Rd, Dorchester Objective: Undertake external masonry works to improve building fabric condition.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender offers a clear description of the works required for masonry repairs with a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks detailed documentation and specific evaluation criteria, impacting its completeness and clarity.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement rules, being an open competition below the threshold. The CPV code is appropriate, and there are no reported disputes. Deadlines are present, although the submission deadline might be tight for some bidders given the lack of detailed documentation.

Clarity80/100

The project description is clear regarding the location and objective of the works. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria and detailed content within the tender documents hinders a complete understanding of how proposals will be assessed.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Key information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are present. However, the critical issue of having zero documents with content significantly reduces its completeness, as bidders cannot fully understand the scope and requirements.

No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open competition, indicating a degree of fairness. The estimated value is disclosed, and the deadlines are stated. The absence of specific company tailoring is noted. However, the lack of accessible documentation and specified evaluation criteria could inadvertently disadvantage bidders.

Practicality65/100

The tender is for below-threshold open competition and includes a contract start date and duration. However, the lack of e-submission functionality and the absence of document content severely impact the practicality of the submission process for potential bidders.

No e-submission
No document content available
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are consistently populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, and the dates provided (submission deadline, contract start) are logically ordered.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, innovation focus, or EU funding. This indicates a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear project description and objective
Open competition procedure
Estimated value disclosed
Key basic information present

Concerns

No tender document content available
Missing evaluation criteria
No e-submission capability
Lack of sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Upload all relevant tender documentation with detailed specifications.
2. Clearly define and publish the evaluation criteria.
3. Consider implementing an e-submission portal for improved practicality.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline