Skip to main content
Tenders

Purchase of workwear, protective footwear and protective equipment

Open
Deadline
19 days left
April 15, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
168931
Value
€60,000
Location
Kurzeme, Latvia
Published
March 23, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 23, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 08, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 15, 2026

Tender Opening

April 15, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€60,000
Duration
12 months
Location
Kurzeme
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€31,811
Avg. Bids
2.2
Competition
Low
SME Winners
100%
1,714 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Purchase of workwear, protective footwear and protective equipment

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

12 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (4)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (3)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must submit a tender that includes both financial and technical offers.
--The tender submission must adhere to the regulations outlined in the tender documents (Iepirkuma nolikums).
--Mandatory and optional documents for submission are detailed in the document 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija'.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not be subject to any of the mandatory exclusion grounds as defined by law.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must be legally registered to operate in their country of establishment.
--Bidders must possess the necessary licenses and permits to conduct business.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must provide a technical offer detailing their proposed workwear, protective footwear, and safety equipment.
--The technical offer must align with the specifications outlined in the technical specification document (Iepirkuma nolikuma 2.pielikums).
--Bidders may need to demonstrate experience in supplying similar goods.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must provide their financial offer as per the format in the technical specification document (Iepirkuma nolikuma 2.pielikums).
--The value of the tender is not specified, so no specific financial threshold is provided.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
168931_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260323174538.pdf -- 99.2 KB

This document outlines the requirements for submitting a tender for work clothing, protective footwear, and safety equipment, detailing mandatory and optional documents for bidders.

Iepirkuma nolikumsDOC
Nolikums_specapģerbs_2026.doc -- 311.5 KB

This document contains the regulations for an open tender procedure by Latgales Industriālais tehnikums for the procurement of work clothing, protective footwear, and safety equipment.

Iepirkuma nolikuma 2.pielikumsXLS
Specapģērbu_iegādes_tehniskā_specifikācija.xl... -- 6.2 MB

This document contains the technical specification for the procurement of workwear, protective footwear, and safety equipment, including a table for bidders to provide their financial and technical offer.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for tender LIT 2026/1, which is an open competition for the procurement of work clothes, protective footwear, and safety equipment by Latgales Industriālais tehnikums.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for workwear and safety equipment is generally well-structured with clear documentation, but lacks explicit evaluation criteria and has potential access restrictions for some documents, impacting fairness and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard legal requirements for an open procedure, including a proper CPV code and reasonable deadlines. No disputes are noted. The procedure is clearly defined as open.

Clarity80/100

The description of the goods is clear, and the requirements are documented in attached specifications and regulations. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria introduces ambiguity.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. Key documents like technical specifications and tender regulations are attached. However, the financial offer requirement is noted as 'not specified' in the AI-extracted requirements, which is a contradiction to the document summary.

Potential contradiction regarding financial offer specification
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure with disclosed value and uses e-procurement. However, the 'Restricted document access' issue raises concerns about full document accessibility for all potential bidders, potentially impacting fairness.

Restricted document access
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is positive. However, the 'No e-submission' flag contradicts the 'E-Procurement' characteristic, creating confusion. The contract start date is not explicitly mentioned, and financing information is absent.

Contradiction regarding e-submission
Contract start date not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. There are no noted disputes or suspensions. Dates appear logical within the tender timeline.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded.

No green procurement mentioned
No social criteria mentioned

Strengths

Clear description of goods
Open tender procedure
E-procurement utilized
Key documents attached

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
Potential restricted document access
Contradiction regarding e-submission
Lack of sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Clarify evaluation criteria to ensure transparency.
2. Ensure all tender documents are fully accessible to all potential bidders.
3. Provide explicit information on contract start date and financing.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline