Skip to main content
Tenders

Construction of a recreational and leisure facility, including the construction of a playground and small architectural objects in Medynia Głogowska

Open
Deadline
5 days left
April 02, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
2026/BZP 00159167/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Podkarpackie, Poland
Published
March 20, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 17, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 26, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 02, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
Not specified
Location
Podkarpackie
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€12,641,706
Avg. Bids
0.1
Competition
Low
SME Winners
86%
133,693 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Construction of a recreational and leisure facility, including the construction of a playground and small architectural objects in Medynia Głogowska

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No information provided in the data.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No information provided in the data.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information provided in the data.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information provided in the data.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No information provided in the data.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

2 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de842d-58f7-7085-056e-e500011b6d9b.pdf

This document is a tender notice for the construction of a recreational facility, including a playground and architectural elements, in Medynia Głogowska, Poland.

Zał nr 1,2,3 do SWZ.docxDOC
Zał nr 1,2,3 do SWZ.docx

This document contains the Offer Form (Annex 1), a Statement on meeting participation conditions and absence of exclusion grounds (Annex 2), and a Statement on remedial measures if exclusion grounds apply (Annex 2, second part), and a list of construction works and personnel (Annex 3) for a public procurement procedure.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the construction of a recreational facility is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a defined scope. However, it lacks crucial details regarding evaluation criteria and financial aspects, impacting its completeness and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements, including a proper CPV code and a clear procedure type. Deadlines appear reasonable given the submission date. No disputes are indicated. The procedure is active and appears to be in compliance with general procurement regulations.

Clarity80/100

The description of the project is clear, outlining the construction of a playground and architectural elements. The attached documents provide necessary forms and notices. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria creates ambiguity for bidders.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, and a submission deadline. The CPV code and location are specified. However, the estimated value and contract duration are not disclosed, and crucial requirements (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, submission) are not detailed within the provided data, significantly impacting completeness.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
Missing contract duration
Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, promoting accessibility. The full document access is implied by the availability of attachments. However, the lack of disclosed estimated value and the absence of specified objective evaluation criteria could be perceived as less fair, although no specific company tailoring is evident.

Value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is a positive aspect. However, the absence of explicit information regarding e-submission details, contract start date, and financing information limits its practicality for potential bidders. The deadline, while active, might be considered short without further context.

No e-submission details
Missing contract start date
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. The CPV code and location are consistent. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided are logical.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. This suggests a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear project description and scope
Active e-procurement process
Proper CPV code and reference number provided
Essential documents (forms, notices) are available

Concerns

Lack of disclosed estimated value
Absence of specified evaluation criteria
Missing detailed requirements (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial)
Limited information on contract start date and financing

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
2. Clearly define the evaluation criteria for submitted bids.
3. Provide detailed information on all mandatory and optional requirements for bidders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline