Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Procurement of technology and software systems (Part 2)

Open
Deadline
14 days left
April 30, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
168898
Value
€200,000
Location
Riga, Latvia
Published
April 01, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

April 01, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 23, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 30, 2026

Tender Opening

April 30, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€200,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Riga
Type
Supplies
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€171,259
Avg. Bids
1.3
Competition
Low
SME Winners
98%
736 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Procurement of technology and software systems (Part 2)
EU Funded

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for technology and software systems presents a moderate opportunity for experienced suppliers. The key to winning lies in a strong technical proposal that clearly addresses the specified requirements, coupled with a cost-effective financial offer. Leveraging the weighted evaluation criteria, particularly those related to quality and functionality, will be crucial for differentiation.

Key Winning Messages

Delivering reliable and high-quality technology solutions tailored to the specific needs of a children's hospital, backed by strong manufacturer warranties and proven experience.

Optimizing total cost of ownership through competitive pricing, efficient spare parts management, and energy-efficient equipment.

Key Opportunities
Significant weighting on 'B category - Desired requirements' (30 points) and 'C category - Additional functionality' (15 points) allows for strong differentiation through superior technical offerings.
The evaluation methodology of 'Economic advantage assessment (price or cost-effectiveness and quality criteria)' indicates that a balance between competitive pricing and strong technical merit will be rewarded.
The inclusion of 'Spare parts costs' (5 points) and 'Additional warranty' (3 points) as evaluation criteria provides an avenue to demonstrate long-term value and reduced operational risk.
The option to submit 'Other documents' allows for the inclusion of supporting materials that can bolster the bid, such as case studies or testimonials specific to healthcare environments.
Key Challenges
Lack of detailed structured requirements and unspecified evaluation criteria makes it difficult to precisely tailor the bid and understand the exact weighting of different aspects.

Thoroughly review Annexes 1, 1.1, 2, 3, and 4 (if available) for any implicit or explicit requirements. Proactively engage with the contracting authority through clarification questions (if permitted) to gain deeper insight into their priorities and the specific details of the evaluation criteria. Assume a balanced approach to quality and price, but lean towards excelling in the explicitly stated quality criteria.

The absence of 'Green Procurement' and 'Social Aspects' requirements means these cannot be leveraged for differentiation, shifting the focus solely to technical and economic factors.

Focus all efforts on maximizing scores in the technical and financial evaluation criteria. Ensure all mandatory requirements are met meticulously. While not explicitly required, consider subtly highlighting any inherent sustainability or social benefits of the proposed technology if it aligns with the bidder's standard offering, but do not make it a primary focus.

Ideal Bidder Profile
An experienced technology and software systems provider with a proven track record in supplying to public sector healthcare organizations. The ideal bidder will possess robust quality management systems (evidenced by ISO certification), a strong understanding of energy efficiency in technology, and the ability to offer competitive pricing for both initial purchase and ongoing maintenance (spare parts).
Key Requirements
Submission of completed and signed application forms (Annex 1 and 1.1)
Evidence of bidder experience as per Clause 3.5.8
Documentation for equipment warranty as per Clause 3.5.6
Documentation for origin and manufacturer's warranty as per Clause 3.5.7
Completed and signed Technical Specification (Annex 2)
Completed and signed Financial Offer (Annex 3)
Compliance with Technical Specification requirements
Meeting the 'B category - Desired requirements' (30 points)
Meeting the 'C category - Additional functionality' (15 points)
Key Discriminators
Demonstrating a deep understanding of the unique operational needs of a children's hospital and how the proposed technology directly addresses these. This can be achieved through detailed case studies or specific examples within the technical proposal.
Offering a superior warranty package or proactive maintenance support that goes beyond the minimum requirements, showcasing a commitment to long-term reliability and minimizing downtime for critical hospital functions.
Providing a demonstrably lower total cost of ownership, not just on initial purchase price, but also considering energy efficiency and the cost/availability of spare parts over the expected lifespan of the technology.
Social Value Opportunities
While not a mandatory requirement, consider including a statement about commitment to ethical sourcing of components and responsible disposal of old equipment at the end of its lifecycle, if applicable to the bidder's standard practices. This can be included in the 'Other documents' section.
Bid Focus Areas
B category - Desired requirements30.00

Exceed expectations by providing features and functionalities that are highly desirable for a hospital environment, even if not strictly mandatory. Map these directly to the technical specification and clearly articulate the benefits. Ensure the 'inverted proportion' calculation is maximized by offering the most comprehensive set of desired features.

C category - Additional functionality15

Identify and propose advanced or innovative functionalities that add significant value beyond the core requirements. Clearly explain how these functionalities will benefit the hospital's operations, patient care, or staff efficiency. Aim to offer the most comprehensive and impactful additional features.

Price or cost-effectivenessN/A (part of economic advantage)

Develop a highly competitive financial offer that balances profitability with market attractiveness. Conduct thorough cost analysis to ensure the price is justifiable and reflects the value offered. Consider offering tiered pricing or volume discounts if applicable.

ISO quality certification5

Ensure valid ISO certification (e.g., ISO 9001) is submitted as evidence. If multiple certifications are held, highlight those most relevant to quality management and service delivery in a healthcare context.

Energy efficiency of offered equipment5

Provide clear data and certifications demonstrating the energy efficiency of the proposed technology. Quantify potential energy savings where possible. This directly impacts operational costs and aligns with modern procurement expectations.

Spare parts costs5.00

Offer competitive pricing for spare parts and provide clear information on their availability and lead times. Demonstrate a robust supply chain for critical components to ensure minimal disruption.

Additional warranty3

Offer an extended warranty period or enhanced warranty terms beyond the standard manufacturer's offering. This demonstrates confidence in the product's reliability and provides added peace of mind to the contracting authority.

Recommendations7
Meticulous Document Submission
CriticalMed effort

Ensure all required documents (Annexes 1, 1.1, 2, 3, and evidence for experience, warranty, origin) are accurately completed, signed, and uploaded in the correct format and within file size limits. Double-check all fields for accuracy.

Avoids mandatory exclusion due to administrative errors.
Maximize 'Desired' and 'Additional' Functionality Scores
CriticalHigh effort

Thoroughly analyze the 'B category - Desired requirements' and 'C category - Additional functionality' sections in Annex 4. Propose solutions that not only meet but exceed these requirements, clearly articulating the added value and benefits for the children's hospital.

Significantly boosts the technical score, a major component of the evaluation.
Demonstrate Healthcare-Specific Expertise
HighMed effort

In the 'Bidder experience' section and potentially in 'Other documents', provide specific examples and case studies of successful technology implementations in hospital environments, ideally pediatric settings. Highlight understanding of clinical workflows and patient safety.

Builds trust and credibility, positioning the bidder as a specialist.
Competitive Pricing with Total Cost of Ownership Focus
HighMed effort

Develop a financial offer that is competitive on initial price but also demonstrates a lower total cost of ownership through energy efficiency and reasonable spare parts costs. Clearly present these long-term cost benefits.

Optimizes the 'economic advantage' score by balancing price and long-term value.
Clarify Ambiguities
MediumLow effort

If permitted by the tender process, submit clarification questions to the contracting authority regarding any vague requirements or the specific weighting of evaluation criteria to ensure the bid is perfectly aligned.

Reduces the risk of misinterpreting requirements and ensures a more targeted bid.
Highlight Warranty and Support
MediumLow effort

Offer an extended warranty or enhanced support package that goes beyond the minimum requirements. Clearly articulate the benefits of this superior support in terms of reduced risk and operational continuity for the hospital.

Adds value and peace of mind, differentiating from competitors offering standard terms.
Leverage ISO Certification
MediumLow effort

Ensure that the ISO quality certification is prominently displayed and easily accessible within the submission. If multiple relevant certifications exist, highlight them.

Directly contributes to the 'ISO quality certification' evaluation criterion.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most technically advanced and reliable solution, emphasizing how the proposed technology directly addresses the specific needs of a children's hospital. Highlight superior features within the 'Desired' and 'Additional' functionality categories.
Underscore the long-term value proposition by demonstrating a lower total cost of ownership, supported by competitive spare parts pricing and energy-efficient equipment, in addition to a strong warranty.
Emphasize proven experience in the healthcare sector, showcasing a deep understanding of the operational environment and the ability to deliver solutions that enhance patient care and operational efficiency.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI extracts and organizes all requirements from tender documents — mandatory qualifications, technical specifications, financial conditions, and submission rules — clearly categorized so you know exactly what's needed to bid.

Login

Basic Requirements

  • EU funding compliance required
  • Specific performance conditions apply

Documents

2 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
168898_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260401051034.pdf -- 98.2 KB

No summary available for this document.

Iepirkuma dokumentācijaZIP
Konkursa dokumentācija.zip -- 371.1 KB

No summary available for this document.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

Quality Score

Comprehensive quality analysis of this tender scoring legal compliance, clarity, completeness, fairness, practicality, data consistency, and sustainability on a 0-100 scale with detailed breakdown and recommendations.

Login

Add to Pipeline