Skip to main content
Tenders

Set of instruments for urological manipulations and examinations

Open
Deadline
10 days left
April 06, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
168473
Value
€83,000
Location
Latgale, Latvia
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 19, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 30, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 06, 2026

Tender Opening

April 06, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€83,000
Duration
2 months
Location
Latgale
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€36,535
Avg. Bids
2.1
Competition
Low
SME Winners
100%
23,680 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Set of instruments for urological manipulations and examinations

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

9 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (5)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--[Specific submission requirements will be detailed in the tender documents]
--Offers must be submitted by the deadline: 2026-04-06T10:00:00
--The contract duration is 62 months from the signing date.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[Specific exclusion grounds will be detailed in the tender documents]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[Specific eligibility requirements will be detailed in the tender documents]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[Specific technical capability requirements will be detailed in the tender documents]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[Specific financial requirements will be detailed in the tender documents]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
168473_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260319050908.pdf -- 97.8 KB

This document outlines the tender requirements for a set of instruments for urological manipulations and examinations, including exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical and financial proposal requirements, and evaluation criteria.

Iepirkuma procedūras ar identifikācijas Nr. RS 2026/15 nolikumsDOC
Nolikums_RS_2026_15.docx -- 94.6 KB

This document contains the regulations for an open tender procedure (RS 2026/15) for the supply, installation, training, maintenance, and upkeep of an instrument set for urological manipulations and examinations for Rēzekne Hospital.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for an open tender (RS 2026/15) for the supply of an instrument kit for urological manipulations and examinations, with a deadline for submission of offers on April 6, 2026.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for urological instruments is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and a reasonable timeline. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and has restricted document access, impacting transparency.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal requirements with a clear procedure and proper CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable given the contract duration. No disputes are reported. The procedure is open, suggesting regulatory compliance.

Clarity80/100

The title and description are clear. The AI-extracted requirements indicate that specific details for exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements are within the tender documents, which are summarized as containing these details. However, the absence of explicitly stated evaluation criteria in the main notice is a minor clarity issue.

Missing explicit evaluation criteria in the main notice.
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. The contract duration is clearly specified in months. Three tender documents are attached, covering the main notice, regulations, and technical specifications. However, the AI-extracted requirements state that specific details are within these documents, implying that the main notice itself is not fully complete in detailing all requirements.

Specific exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements are detailed in separate documents, not fully presented in the main notice.
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure and uses e-procurement, which promotes fairness. The estimated value is disclosed. Deadlines are reasonable. However, the 'Restricted document access' flag is a significant concern for fairness, as it limits full document access for potential bidders.

Restricted document access.
Practicality65/100

The tender specifies e-procurement and provides a URL for the electronic procurement system (implied by 'Elektronisko iepirkumu sistēma'). The contract start date is implicitly linked to the signing date. Financing information is not explicitly detailed. The duration is clearly specified.

Financing information is not explicitly detailed.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. The contract duration (62 months) is logically broken down into delivery/installation/training (2 months) and maintenance (60 months). No suspension or disputes are noted. Dates are consistent.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not flagged as EU funded. This indicates a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

No explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation.

Strengths

Clear basic information and title.
Open procedure and e-procurement.
Reasonable deadlines and disclosed value.
Detailed contract duration breakdown.

Concerns

Restricted document access.
Missing explicit evaluation criteria.
Lack of sustainability considerations.

Recommendations

1. Ensure full and unrestricted access to all tender documents.
2. Clearly state evaluation criteria within the main tender notice or accessible documents.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability criteria (e.g., green procurement) into future tenders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline