Development of amendments and author's supervision for the construction design documentation "New connecting street between Prohorova and Cepļu Street in Jelgava"

This tender for construction design documentation changes and author supervision in Jelgava is generally well-structured, with clear technical requirements and a reasonable timeline. However, the lack of disclosed financial value and specific evaluation criteria for certain aspects, along with potential document access restrictions, are notable concerns.

The tender adheres to open procedure and includes a CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable, and the procedure is generally clear. Regulatory compliance is assumed given the public authority. No disputes are noted. The primary concern is the potential for restricted document access, which could impact legal compliance if not resolved.

The title and description are clear, outlining the scope of work. Technical requirements are detailed, and the presence of multiple contract drafts and regulations contributes to clarity. However, the 'Issues' section flags missing evaluation criteria, which could lead to ambiguity in the assessment process.

Most basic information is present, including title, organization, and a clear description. The submission deadline and tender validity are specified. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the contract duration is not explicitly stated, impacting overall completeness.

The tender is an open procedure with e-procurement characteristics, promoting fairness. Eligibility requirements are standard for EU/EEA entities. The main concern is the 'Issues' flagging restricted document access, which could limit full document access for potential bidders. The evaluation criteria, while partially detailed, could be more comprehensive.

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is a positive for submission practicality. A clear submission deadline is provided. However, the absence of explicit financing information and contract duration reduces practicality. The 'Issues' section also notes 'No e-submission', which contradicts the 'E-Procurement' characteristic and needs clarification.

Key fields such as title, organization, reference, and deadlines are populated. The tender status is active, and no disputes are reported. Dates appear logical. The CPV code and NUTS code are provided. The main potential inconsistency lies in the 'Issues' flagging 'No e-submission' while 'E-Procurement' is listed as a characteristic.

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded. This lack of focus on sustainability aspects results in a moderate score.