Skip to main content
Tenders

Maintenance & Repair of Vessel Propulsion Drives

Open
Deadline
28 days left
April 24, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
027255-2026
Value
£200,000
Location
East Yorkshire and Northern Lincolnshire, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 25, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 17, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 24, 2026

Contract Start Date

June 14, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£200,000
Duration
36 months
Location
East Yorkshire and Northern Lincolnshire
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

The Scottish Ministers acting through Marine Directorate invites tenders from suitably qualified suppliers to undertake annual health checks of the propulsion drives fitted on its compliance vessels; MPV Jura, MPV Minna and MPV Hirta.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender provides a clear scope for vessel propulsion drive maintenance with adequate financial and temporal information. However, key tender documents are not accessible and evaluation criteria are missing, impacting clarity and completeness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender follows an open procedure with a specified CPV code and NUTS code, suggesting a degree of regulatory adherence. The provided timeline appears reasonable for the scope. No explicit disputes or flags are raised regarding legal compliance in the provided data.

Clarity80/100

The description of services required is clear, focusing on annual health checks for specific vessels. However, the lack of accessible tender documents and missing evaluation criteria significantly reduces the overall clarity for potential bidders.

Missing reveal date
No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Basic information like title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration are present. However, the critical absence of accessible tender document content prevents a thorough assessment of completeness for potential bidders.

No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is open, with a disclosed estimated value and a reasonable deadline, promoting fairness. The e-procurement characteristic suggests a modern approach. The primary concern is the lack of accessibility to full tender documentation, which could hinder fair competition.

No document content available
Practicality65/100

The presence of an e-procurement characteristic is positive. However, the mention of 'No e-submission' in the checks is contradictory and raises concerns about the ease of submission. The contract start date is provided, but financing details are absent.

No e-submission (contradictory to e-procurement characteristic)
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated and appear logically consistent. The status is 'active', and there are no reported disputes, indicating good data integrity within the provided information.

Sustainability50/100

The tender currently lacks specific mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation, and is not indicated as EU funded. This limits its score in the sustainability category.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear scope and service description
Adequate financial and temporal information disclosed
Open procedure with e-procurement characteristic
Correct CPV and NUTS codes provided

Concerns

Inaccessible tender document content
Missing evaluation criteria
Potential ambiguity regarding e-submission

Recommendations

1. Make full tender documents accessible to all potential bidders.
2. Specify clear evaluation criteria to enhance transparency.
3. Clarify the e-submission process.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline